Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test to check if typedefs are being unnecessarily resolved. #97

Closed
wants to merge 224 commits into from

Conversation

sudo-panda
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

vgvassilev and others added 23 commits May 24, 2023 07:38
This patch removes the external calls to getInterpreter/getSema in favor of
storing them as static variables. That improves the ABI resilience of the API.
…ation

- Added Comments (Function Definitions) for CppInterOp Doxygen documentation

- Incorporated minor changes in Interop.cpp and InterOp.h, as suggested   in Vassil's review

- changes to preamble section reverted

- the "this pointer" term reverted

- Made sentence openings consistent (e.g., Identifies > Checks)

- Executed `git-clang-format` in InterOp.cpp and InterOp.h
- Added CppInterOp Intro writeup
- Removed (previously LibInterOp)
- Broke the lines at 80 columns (except code snippets)
- Worked with Krishna to add improved Build Instructions

Co-Authored-By: Krishna Narayanan <[email protected]>
This patch should fix the valgrind issues.
@vgvassilev
Copy link
Contributor

@sudo-panda what is the fate of this PR? Can you rebase?

@vgvassilev
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in the last meeting we had to do some renaming. GitHub decided to close this PR probably because we rewrote our history. Can you reopen the PR against the new version of main?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants