-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Experimental fast validator code path, using cwl-utils (#1720)
On a very large workflow I was testing with, the validation time went 120 seconds to 20 seconds. * conformance testing: use CWLTOOL_OPTIONS * CWLTOOL_OPTIONS: ignore an empty string * Add loadingContext.skip_resolve_all with note * conformance tests: report CWLTOOL_OPTIONS * CI: include extra options in coverge classname * conformance coverage: normalize paths * Bump cwl-utils version requirement Co-authored-by: Michael R. Crusoe <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
Showing
11 changed files
with
234 additions
and
32 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.