Fix formatting in README.md

[AnjishnuSengupta]

Summary

Describe this PR in 2-5 bullets:

• Problem: Due to a space, the box didn't complete
• Why it matters: It looks good
• What changed: ReadMe.md

UX Journey

Before

(Draw the user-facing flow BEFORE this PR. Show each step the user takes.)

Example:
  User                   Archon                   AI Client
  ────                   ──────                   ─────────
  sends message ──────▶  resolves session
                         loads context
                         streams to AI ──────────▶ processes prompt
                         receives chunks ◀──────── streams response
  sees reply ◀─────────  sends to platform

After

(Draw the user-facing flow AFTER this PR. Highlight what changed with [brackets] or asterisks.)

Architecture Diagram

Before

(Map ALL modules touched or connected to this change. Draw lines between them.)

After

(Same diagram with changes highlighted. Mark new modules with [+], removed with [-],
 modified with [~]. Mark new connections with ===, removed with --x--.)

Label Snapshot

• Risk: risk: none
• Size: size: XS
• Scope: core|workflows|isolation|git|adapters|server|web|cli|paths|config|docs|dependencies|ci|tests|skills
• Module: <scope>:<component> (e.g. workflows:executor, adapters:slack, core:orchestrator)

Change Metadata

• Change type: docs

Linked Issue

• Closes #
• Related #
• Depends on # (if stacked)
• Supersedes # (if replacing older PR)

Security Impact (required)

• New permissions/capabilities? (No)
• New external network calls? (No)
• Secrets/tokens handling changed? (No)
• File system access scope changed? (No)

Compatibility / Migration

• Backward compatible? (Yes)
• Config/env changes? (No)
• Database migration needed? (No)

Human Verification (required)

What was personally validated beyond CI:

• Verified scenarios:
• Edge cases checked:
• What was not verified:

Side Effects / Blast Radius (required)

• Affected subsystems/workflows:
• Potential unintended effects:
• Guardrails/monitoring for early detection:

Rollback Plan (required)

• Fast rollback command/path:
• Feature flags or config toggles (if any):
• Observable failure symptoms:

Risks and Mitigations

List real risks in this PR (or write None).

• Risk: None

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the Architecture diagram formatting in the README for improved alignment and consistency.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 51dc5ca8-0bf7-43ac-8bbd-26dce616f8fd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8334b3 and a786b31.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README.md file's Architecture diagram underwent a minor formatting adjustment, where trailing whitespace was removed from the "Platform Adapters" label after "GitHub" to correct ASCII art alignment. No functional or descriptive changes were introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Formatting README.md	Removed trailing whitespace from the "Platform Adapters" label in the Architecture diagram to improve ASCII art alignment.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A spacing fix, so small yet true,
In ASCII art, we tidy the view,
One trailing space, now swept away,
The diagram aligns perfectly today! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description covers essential sections (Summary, Security Impact, Compatibility) but lacks critical required content including Architecture Diagram comparisons, Validation Evidence, Human Verification details, Side Effects analysis, and Rollback Plan.	Complete all required sections: provide Architecture Diagram Before/After with connection inventory, add validation evidence (test/lint results), detail human verification steps, specify side effects and rollback procedures, and fill empty verification sections.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Fix formatting in README.md' directly and accurately describes the main change—a formatting correction in the README file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.