Lazy load bundle analysis bucket name

[scott-codecov]

Was seeing the default being used in staging even though we have a config var set for this. Not sure if there's some kind of race condition at module initialization time.

Also added the upload storage path (which is currently specified in the API).

[codecov-public-qa]

Codecov Report

Merging #102 (6a6fb49) into main (8196e5c) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #102   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.41%   89.42%           
=======================================
  Files         115      115           
  Lines        9383     9386    +3     
  Branches     1486     1486           
=======================================
+ Hits         8390     8393    +3     
  Misses        789      789           
  Partials      204      204           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python3.10	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.11	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.12	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.8	88.70% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.9	88.97% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
rust	90.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
shared/bundle_analysis/storage.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[codecov-qa]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8196e5c) 89.41% compared to head (6a6fb49) 89.42%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #102   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.41%   89.42%           
=======================================
  Files         115      115           
  Lines        9383     9386    +3     
  Branches     1486     1486           
=======================================
+ Hits         8390     8393    +3     
  Misses        789      789           
  Partials      204      204           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python3.10	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.11	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.12	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.8	88.70% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.9	88.97% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
rust	90.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codecov-staging]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8196e5c) 91.43% compared to head (6a6fb49) 91.44%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #102   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.43%   91.44%           
=======================================
  Files         122      122           
  Lines        9404     9407    +3     
  Branches     1600     1600           
=======================================
+ Hits         8599     8602    +3     
  Misses        789      789           
  Partials       16       16           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python3.10	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.11	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.12	88.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.8	88.70% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
python3.9	88.97% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
rust	90.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.