Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: trigger label analysis task after update #131

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 14, 2023

Conversation

giovanni-guidini
Copy link
Contributor

From codecov/worker#21 we have a different way of handling updates for LabelAnalysisRequest objects.
This is important because we want to use these objects to extract metrics from ATS.

However to actually have the updated values we need to trigger the task again.
These changes trigger the task again :3

closes codecov/engineering-team#456

Legal Boilerplate

Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. In 2022 this entity acquired Codecov and as result Sentry is going to need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.

From codecov/worker#21 we have a different way of handling updates for `LabelAnalysisRequest` objects.
This is important because we want to use these objects to extract metrics from ATS.

However to actually have the updated values we need to trigger the task again.
These changes trigger the task again :3

closes codecov/engineering-team#456
@codecov-staging
Copy link

codecov-staging bot commented Sep 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage is 100.00% of modified lines.

Files Changed Coverage
labelanalysis/views.py 100.00%

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #131 (15c5223) into main (1941ee7) will not change coverage.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #131   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   95.35   95.35           
=====================================
  Files        702     702           
  Lines      14958   14965    +7     
=====================================
+ Hits       14262   14269    +7     
  Misses       696     696           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 95.53% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit-latest-uploader 95.53% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
labelanalysis/views.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@giovanni-guidini giovanni-guidini merged commit 50eee33 into main Sep 14, 2023
19 of 21 checks passed
@giovanni-guidini giovanni-guidini deleted the gio/trigger-label-analysis-task-after-update branch September 14, 2023 13:37
scott-codecov added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2023
* main: (74 commits)
  Fix indentation error (#133)
  Add cache cleanup (#130)
  Feature/lint pre commit (#134)
  feat: trigger label analysis task after update (#131)
  Filter file comparisons by flags (#129)
  chore: Remove hard-coded dev BB redirect URL (#132)
  feat: Validate OIDC ID token during Sentry OAuth flow (#52)
  Adding beginnings of GHA CI (#127)
  feat: Filter flags by flags for pathContents (#128)
  Create checkbox in Owner form in Django admin to set uses_invoice (#109)
  build(deps): bump certifi from 2020.6.20 to 2023.7.22 (#32)
  Feature/no compile (#126)
  Bump django from 4.2.2 to 4.2.3 (#42)
  Don't compile since source is available (#106)
  feat: Add firstPull resolver to GraphQL pull type (#108)
  chore: Upgrade requests and redis dependencies (#124)
  Update LICENSE (#122)
  Attempt migration (#121)
  359 adjust monthly uploads for trialled customers (#119)
  Add changes for monthly uploads to account for trialing customer (#101)
  ...
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Collect metrics
2 participants