Analysis

[c4-bot-9]

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

[c4-pre-sort]

0xRobocop marked the issue as sufficient quality report

[OpenCoreCH]

Unlike other reports, does not only provide generic descriptions / recommendations, but a concrete analysis with recommendations of the project

[c4-judge]

OpenCoreCH marked the issue as grade-b

[iFrostizz]

This concern: https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-02-hydradx-findings/blob/main/data/Franfran-Analysis.md#adding-a-new-token-to-the-omnipool--create-a-stableswap-pool describes the same attack as #116 although arguably less detailed (no coded POC) because of the scope of the analysis. Could that still qualify for a partial credit ?

[OpenCoreCH]

The general idea behind the attack is indeed described, which is nice. However, I am not keen on giving partial credit for only providing an overall idea and a one sentence description of the impact without any details or assessing the feasibility. Such a submitted issue would be completely invalid (without partial credit), so I will treat it the same as part of the analysis.