Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QA Report #25

Open
c4-bot-4 opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

QA Report #25

c4-bot-4 opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working grade-b insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality Q-17 QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax

Comments

@c4-bot-4
Copy link
Contributor

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

@c4-bot-4 c4-bot-4 added bug Something isn't working QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax labels Feb 12, 2024
c4-bot-4 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2024
c4-bot-4 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2024
@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added the insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality label Mar 3, 2024
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

0xRobocop marked the issue as insufficient quality report

@OpenCoreCH
Copy link

Could have definitely been better formatted and formulated, but the recommendations are reasonable and overlap with what have been reported by several wardens as (now downgraded) separate issues

@c4-judge
Copy link

c4-judge commented Mar 8, 2024

OpenCoreCH marked the issue as grade-b

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working grade-b insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality Q-17 QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants