roachtest: port systemschema/validate-after-version-upgrade to new mixed-version framework #110535
Assignees
Labels
A-testing
Testing tools and infrastructure
C-enhancement
Solution expected to add code/behavior + preserve backward-compat (pg compat issues are exception)
GA-blocker
T-sql-foundations
SQL Foundations Team (formerly SQL Schema + SQL Sessions)
Comments
srosenberg
added
C-enhancement
|
Hi @lunevalex, please add branch-* labels to identify which branch(es) this release-blocker affects. 🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf. |
craig bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 3, 2023
113643: roachtest: move validate-after-version-upgrade to new framework r=rafiss a=rafiss The new framework provides a few more testing enhancements and is the only one that will be maintained. fixes #110535 Release note: None 113676: roachtest: fix js install command (gpg) r=rafiss a=annrpom We are seeing a `gpg: cannot open '/dev/tty': No such device or address` error from the new installation method we followed. Resolution seems to be nodejs/docker-node#922. In case we are running into an issue with machines being reused, we first check to see if we can install nodejs and npm before we add a nodesource key and deb repository (to prevent gpg: dearmoring failed: File exists) issues. (Copied from a reply to the bug report in the issue linked above) > For any script use you should anyway use --batch which disables the use of the tty as a side-effect. Fixes: #113673 Fixes: #113662 Fixes: #113659 Fixes: #113675 Fixes: #113677 Fixes: #113762 Release note: None 113698: metamorphic: add MVCC{CheckFor,}AcquireLock operations r=nvanbenschoten a=itsbilal This change adds two new operations to the MVCC metamorphic testing package that were added in #110323. We check for determinism in the storage package by adding these operations to the metamorphic tests as well. Fixes #109650. Epic: none Release note: None Co-authored-by: Rafi Shamim <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Annie Pompa <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bilal Akhtar <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
See the parent issue #110528 for details. Also note,
systemschema/validate-after-version-upgradeseems like a good candidate for the mixed-version logictest framework instead. It might also be a good opportunity to strengthen the assertions being verified by this test.An example is here: #108802
Jira issue: CRDB-31485
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: