Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Improvement] Optimize runtime of single_process_type test #2084

Open
martin-mat opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Improvement] Optimize runtime of single_process_type test #2084

martin-mat opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@martin-mat
Copy link
Collaborator

single_process_type takes much time. Example in GH actions:
https://github.com/cnti-testcatalog/testsuite/actions/runs/9616958098/job/26625214259

It seems that the test executes kubectl numerous times (unnecessarily?)

svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduced resource iteration (up to 2 times!)

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduced resource iteration (up to 2 times!)

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduced resource iteration (up to 2 times!)

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduces resource iteration by only checking the container processes.
- Also introduced changes to the the cluster_tools and k8s_kernel_introspection libraries

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduces resource iteration by only checking the container processes.
- Also introduced changes to the the cluster_tools and k8s_kernel_introspection libraries

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduces resource iteration by only checking the container processes.
- Also introduced changes to the the cluster_tools and k8s_kernel_introspection libraries.

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduces resource iteration by only checking the container processes.
- Also introduced changes to the the cluster_tools and k8s_kernel_introspection libraries.

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduces resource iteration by only checking the container processes.
- Also introduced changes to the the cluster_tools and k8s_kernel_introspection libraries.

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 28, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduces resource iteration by only checking the container processes.
- Also introduced changes to the the cluster_tools and k8s_kernel_introspection libraries.

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
svteb added a commit to svteb/testsuite that referenced this issue Jul 28, 2024
Refs: cnti-testcatalog#2084
- Reduces resource iteration by only checking the container processes.
- Also introduced changes to the the cluster_tools and k8s_kernel_introspection libraries.

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
martin-mat added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2024
* Fix: Optimize single_process_type execution
Refs: #2084
- Reduces resource iteration by only checking the container processes.
- Also introduced changes to the the cluster_tools and k8s_kernel_introspection libraries.

Signed-off-by: svteb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Martin Matyas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants