-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[LTO_X - EventFilter/EcalDigiToRaw] Solve -Wstrict-overflow compiler warning #38682
[LTO_X - EventFilter/EcalDigiToRaw] Solve -Wstrict-overflow compiler warning #38682
Conversation
assign daq |
@cmsbuild , please test for CMSSW_12_5_LTO_X |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38682/30972
|
A new Pull Request was created by @aandvalenzuela (Andrea Valenzuela) for master. It involves the following packages:
@emeschi, @smorovic can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b0b260/26129/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
hold |
Pull request has been put on hold by @perrotta |
|
Hello,
We have seen some compiler warnings of the type
-Wstrict-overflow
in LTO_X IBs (CMSSW_12_5_LTO_X_2022-07-07-1100 and CMSSW_12_5_LTO_X_2022-07-06-1100, for example) inEventFilter/EcalDigiToRaw
. See sample stack trace:Regarding the type of error and following some online discussions of this type of warning fmtlib/fmt/issues/2757, I have tried to workaround it as shown in this PR, but feel free to propose other solutions that could be better regarding the analysis itself.
Many thanks,
Andrea.