Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Create codeql workflow #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2023
Merged

ci: Create codeql workflow #4

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

ctlong
Copy link
Member

@ctlong ctlong commented Dec 16, 2023

Runs static analysis on PRs and pushes.

@ctlong ctlong requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2023 20:05
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link

@chombium chombium left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ctlong ctlong merged commit 0a05a0b into main Dec 19, 2023
3 of 4 checks passed
@ctlong ctlong deleted the ci/create-codeql-workflow branch December 19, 2023 17:13
@ctlong
Copy link
Member Author

ctlong commented Dec 19, 2023

Ignoring the failed status check from Concourse. This change does not affect the actual release, it just adds a new GH actions workflow. That failure is unrelated, and due to issues with the CF-D environments used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants