-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 218
Enable use of hostname from nats links #530
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -4,8 +4,12 @@ | |
| nats_machines = nil | ||
| if_p('diego.route_emitter.nats.machines') do |ips| | ||
| nats_machines = ips.compact | ||
| end.else_if_link('nats') do | ||
| nats_machines = link('nats').instances.map { |instance| instance.address } | ||
| end.else do | ||
|
||
| link('nats').if_p("nats.hostname") do |hostname| | ||
| nats_machines = [hostname] | ||
| end.else do | ||
| nats_machines = link('nats').instances.map { |instance| instance.address } | ||
| end | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| nats_port = nil | ||
|
|
@@ -32,6 +36,9 @@ | |
| if_link('nats-tls') do |nats_link| | ||
| if p("diego.route_emitter.nats.tls.enabled") | ||
| nats_machines = nats_link.instances.map { |instance| instance.address } | ||
| nats_link.if_p("nats.hostname") do |hostname| | ||
| nats_machines = [hostname] | ||
| end | ||
| if_p("diego.route_emitter.nats.tls.hostname") do | prop | | ||
| nats_machines = [prop] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if getting rid of the
if_link('nats')check would break anythingUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this is not really an issue. The previous code if there was no nats link and no nats.machines specified would set nothing for the nats addresses. And the route_emitter would fail connecting to nats.
Now this code will, if there is no nats.machines specified and there is no nats link, fail trying to get the nats link on line 8.
Both will have the route_emitter failing. This code is exactly the same as what the route_registrar does and that is why I implemented it as such.
If you want the route_emitter to fail the same way it does now instead of failing this new way we could change line 7 to match the end.else_if_link('nats') do
But I do feel that it is better to fail during the deployment rather than have a successful deploy that when the route_emitter starts will not be able to connect to nats
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand Andrew correctly, previously, if there was no nats link and no nats.machines specified, then the code would set nothing for the nats addresses. And then the route_emitter would subsequently fail at runtime because it would be unable to connect to nats as there were no machines/addresses.
This PR will change the behavior so that it will fail at deploy time because it cannot get the required nats link. That is better than failing at runtime