Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 BUG: C3 inconsistent fullstack framework names #7662

Closed
dario-piotrowicz opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #7664
Closed

🐛 BUG: C3 inconsistent fullstack framework names #7662

dario-piotrowicz opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #7664
Assignees
Labels
bug Something that isn't working

Comments

@dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Member

Which Cloudflare product(s) does this pertain to?

C3 (npm create cloudflare)

What versions are you using?

2.35.1

What operating system and version are you using?

Mac

Please provide a link to a minimal reproduction

No response

Describe the Bug

C3 has inconsistent names for the various fullstack frameworks

it does have a SvelteKit entry (updated from just svelte in #7109), but it calls solidStart just solid and qwikCity just qwik, also Next.js is simply called Next

see:
Screenshot 2025-01-03 at 15 21 25

I think that all the names should be the full official names and not shortened

Please provide any relevant error logs

No response

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz added the bug Something that isn't working label Jan 3, 2025
@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz self-assigned this Jan 3, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Untriaged in workers-sdk Jan 3, 2025
@emily-shen emily-shen moved this from Untriaged to Backlog in workers-sdk Jan 3, 2025
@dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Member Author

dario-piotrowicz commented Jan 3, 2025

Quick update about qwik (pun intended 😅)

After giving it some thought, given their move to Qwik Router instead of Qwik City, and given the fact that they seem to want to present qwik as a framework on its own, not as one that needs a metaframework on top of it (QwikDev/qwik-evolution#186)

I think that it's better to keep the Qwik name as is

@shairez do you agree? 🙂

@shairez
Copy link

shairez commented Jan 4, 2025

@dario-piotrowicz yes! You are correct sir! 😊

@dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Member Author

@shairez got it, thanks a lot for the confirmation! 🫶

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in workers-sdk Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something that isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants