-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 218
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: missing error message when return HTTPResult #785
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ | ||
/* | ||
Copyright 2022 The CloudEvents Authors | ||
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package main | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"context" | ||
"fmt" | ||
"log" | ||
"net/http" | ||
|
||
cloudevents "github.com/cloudevents/sdk-go/v2" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func main() { | ||
ctx := context.Background() | ||
p, err := cloudevents.NewHTTP() | ||
if err != nil { | ||
log.Fatalf("failed to create protocol: %s", err.Error()) | ||
} | ||
|
||
c, err := cloudevents.NewClient(p) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
log.Fatalf("failed to create client, %v", err) | ||
} | ||
|
||
log.Printf("will listen on :8080\n") | ||
log.Fatalf("failed to start receiver: %s", c.StartReceiver(ctx, receive)) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func receive(ctx context.Context, event cloudevents.Event) cloudevents.Result { | ||
fmt.Printf("%s", event) | ||
if event.Type() != "com.cloudevents.sample.sent" { | ||
return cloudevents.NewHTTPResult(http.StatusBadRequest, "invalid type of %s", event.Type()) | ||
} | ||
return cloudevents.NewHTTPResult(http.StatusOK, "") | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I remember why we did not allow this, we need a way to let the integrator control if the error body is sent or not, some senders expect a cloudevent in response and this will not parse as a cloudevent as a result.
I am in favor of landing this as is but waiting for a release to add an option to control the output format here to let the integrator choose how this error is formatted on return.