-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement consistent filtering rules proposal #1256
Comments
3 tasks
RReverser
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2024
- Limit types to those defined in the consistent filtering proposal (#1256). - Make `filterBy` a lazy iterable for consistency and performance reasons. - Add `findBy` for unique fields as per proposal.
This was referenced May 22, 2024
RReverser
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 28, 2024
- Limit types to those defined in the consistent filtering proposal (#1256). - Make `filterBy` a lazy iterable for consistency and performance reasons. - Add `findBy` for unique fields as per proposal.
RReverser
added a commit
to clockworklabs/com.clockworklabs.spacetimedbsdk
that referenced
this issue
May 28, 2024
## Description of Changes As a result of the consistent filtering rules proposal (clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB#1256), all equatable types are now natively equatable in C# as well. This allows us to compare objects directly, without holding and comparing AlgebraicValue in the entries map as well, which has a bit of a domino effect and allows to optimise, simplify or even remove some parts of the SDK. ## API - [x] This is an API breaking change to the SDK New filtering rules limit types on which filtering can be done, as well as change the return type of `FilterBy` functions to always be iterable. ## Requires SpacetimeDB PRs clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB#1277
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 28, 2024
- Limit types to those defined in the consistent filtering proposal (#1256). - Make `filterBy` a lazy iterable for consistency and performance reasons. - Add `findBy` for unique fields as per proposal.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Progress:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: