Relationship Cache check #25751
Merged
Relationship Cache check #25751
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
(Standard links)
|
|
Nice improvement - check your style - https://test.civicrm.org/job/CiviCRM-Core-Style/1016/checkstyle/ |
MegaphoneJon
force-pushed
the
relationship-cache-check
branch
from
304e59f to
9b38181
Compare
|
Why not |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
I found a problem where a site intermittently doesn't have a relationship cache trigger (even though logging triggers were all present). I don't know how that's possible - but then again, I don't know how it's possible to not have a
phone_numericfunction, and we check for that.Before
No check for relationship cache trigger.
After
Warning-level check for relationship cache triggers.