Enotice fix on extensions page

[eileenmcnaughton]

Overview

Enotice fix on extensions page

Before

After

Technical Details

I dug around and I think upgradable is an obsolete row value - I couldn't find where it
was set - including when I marked an extension as an older version in info.xml

Comments

@totten this is one of a bunch of notices on that page - I'm wondering if you would recognise some of the fields as dated if you looked (also I think it's OK for there to be notices if they are fields we think really should be filled in in the info.xml)

[civibot]

(Standard links)

• If this is your first pull-request for CiviCRM, please browse CONTRIBUTING.md for information about the development and testing processes.
• If you are reviewing this pull-request, you may wish to consult the test sites and the Review Standards (long template, short template).

[demeritcowboy]

I agree that upgradable doesn't seem to be used anywhere - BUT - if you put a line <upgradable>1</upgradable> into your info.xml it does get picked up. Maybe it was an earlier way of flagging something.

[eileenmcnaughton]

Hmm - maybe @totten can recall

[eileenmcnaughton]

@demeritcowboy I suspect we won't get Tim's attention on this - but I think maybe we can treat this https://docs.civicrm.org/dev/en/latest/extensions/info-xml/ as authoritative about what is supported in info.xml