Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use konstruktoid/ansible-role-hardening? #96

Open
jsf9k opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #106
Open

Use konstruktoid/ansible-role-hardening? #96

jsf9k opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #106
Assignees
@jsf9k
Labels
breaking change This issue or pull request involves changes to existing functionality

Comments

@jsf9k
Copy link
Member

jsf9k commented Dec 19, 2023 •
edited
Loading

💡 Summary

Is it possible to use konstruktoid/ansible-role-hardening for this Packer build if we override the default values for role variables?

Motivation and context

This would be cleaner than using our forks of konstruktoid/ansible-role-hardening.
@jsf9k jsf9k added the breaking change This issue or pull request involves changes to existing functionality label Dec 19, 2023
@jsf9k jsf9k self-assigned this Dec 19, 2023
@jsf9k jsf9k changed the title Use konstructoid/ansible-role-hardening? Use konstruktoid/ansible-role-hardening? Dec 19, 2023
@jsf9k jsf9k mentioned this issue Jan 3, 2024
Merged
4 tasks
@konstruktoid konstruktoid linked a pull request May 6, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
12 tasks
jsf9k pushed a commit to konstruktoid/openvpn-packer that referenced this issue May 29, 2024
@konstruktoid @jsf9k
Initial refactor for issue cisagov#96
10a2734 
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sjögren <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jsf9k jsf9k

Labels
breaking change This issue or pull request involves changes to existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@jsf9k