[CLN]: remove offset ID atomic from record segment reader

[codetheweb]

Description of changes

Small cleanup to clarify usage of offset ID on reader.

Test plan

How are these changes tested?

• Tests pass locally with pytest for python, yarn test for js, cargo test for rust

Documentation Changes

Are all docstrings for user-facing APIs updated if required? Do we need to make documentation changes in the docs repository?
n/a

[github-actions]

Reviewer Checklist

Please leverage this checklist to ensure your code review is thorough before approving

Testing, Bugs, Errors, Logs, Documentation

• Can you think of any use case in which the code does not behave as intended? Have they been tested?
• Can you think of any inputs or external events that could break the code? Is user input validated and safe? Have they been tested?
• If appropriate, are there adequate property based tests?
• If appropriate, are there adequate unit tests?
• Should any logging, debugging, tracing information be added or removed?
• Are error messages user-friendly?
• Have all documentation changes needed been made?
• Have all non-obvious changes been commented?

System Compatibility

• Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system or backward compatibility?
• Does this change intersect with any items on our roadmap, and if so, is there a plan for fitting them together?

Quality

• Is this code of a unexpectedly high quality (Readability, Modularity, Intuitiveness)

[codetheweb]

• [CLN]: remove offset ID atomic from record segment reader #3371 👈 (View in Graphite)
• [PERF]: pipeline segment committing/flushing #3360
• [ENH]: parallelize applying materialized log to segment writers #3359
• [ENH]: move materialization into operator #3357
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.