Repository navigation
merge queue: checking release/v3.8.49 (7123236), #7106, #7116 and #7119 together - #7485
Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 10 commits into
Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 10 commits into
mergify[bot] wants to merge 10 commits into
Conversation
… 9router#2461)
Root cause: the STREAMING branch of AntigravityExecutor.executeOnce() had no
!response.ok check at all — it unconditionally wrapped the upstream response
body in a pass-through TransformStream, unlike the sibling non-streaming
branch which already built a sanitized error via buildAntigravityUpstreamError.
When Google's 403 error body was binary/non-UTF8 (observed: gzip-magic-byte
payloads), those raw bytes were forwarded verbatim, corrupting the
client-visible error message ('[ERROR] [403]: <control-byte garbage>').
Fix: add the same !response.ok guard to the streaming branch, routing through
buildAntigravityUpstreamError()/buildErrorBody() (hard rule #12) instead of
piping unknown bytes through as if they were an SSE stream.
Reported-by: Duongkhanhtool (decolua/9router#2461)
…s (port from 9router#1811) parseInnerCall only split arg segments on a newline between the arg name and its value. Cursor's live Composer/Auto output has been observed using a single space instead, so those segments were treated as one long (space-containing) arg name with an empty value, silently no-opping Write/tool calls for Composer/Auto models. Fall back to splitting on the first whitespace boundary when no newline is present in the segment. Reported-by: way-art (decolua/9router#1811)
…(port from 9router#1037)
The Vercel relay deploy route disabled Deployment Protection (SSO) by firing a PATCH request with .catch(() => {}) and never checking res.ok. When Vercel rejects or no-ops the PATCH (plan doesn't allow disabling protection, an under-scoped token, etc.), the relay was still saved and activated as a healthy proxy pool, and later requests routed through it failed with an undiagnosed 403 Access denied from Vercel's own deployment protection — indistinguishable from an upstream-provider rejection (e.g. Codex/ChatGPT edge-IP blocking).
Extract disableSsoProtection() to check the PATCH response and surface an ssoProtectionWarning in the deploy response when it fails, so the failure source can be diagnosed instead of silently masked.
Reported-by: Rico Aditya (@ricatix) (decolua/9router#1037)
…ve-complexity ratchet at baseline The SSO-protection check added to POST pushed its cognitive complexity from 15 to 21, regressing the cognitive-complexity ratchet (891 > baseline 890). Extract two pure helpers with identical behavior: - buildDeployErrorResponse(): the sanitized non-ok Vercel deploy response - resolveSsoProtectionWarning(): the SSO PATCH check + warning string POST now reads as a flat sequence of guards. No behavior change.
…sso-protection-check
4 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
✨ Pull request #7116 ahead in the queue was removed (reason:
pull request dequeued). The pull request #7119 has been requeued. ✨Branch release/v3.8.49 (7123236), #7106, #7116 and #7119 are queued together for merge.
This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #7119.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.
Required conditions of queue rule
releasefor merge:#check-pending=0check-success=Merge integrity (changelog + generated skills)#check-success>=1#check-failure=0#check-failure=1check-failure=dast-smokeRequired conditions to stay in the queue:
-conflict-draftbase~=^release/v\d+\.\d+\.\d+$label=queue