[PauloFH]

Summary

• restores sanitizeLiveWsPort and resolveLiveWsUrl, omitted when the changes from fix(dashboard): honour the live WebSocket port the handshake reports (#11331) #11388 were squashed
• fixes the Turbopack import failures currently blocking the v3.8.51 release pipeline
• keeps the patch identical to the original implementation covered by the existing regression test

Validation

• live-ws-url-11331: 11/11 passing
• Prettier check: passing
• ESLint for wsPath.ts: passing
• typecheck:core: passing
• full production build deferred to CI because the local machine ran out of resources

[PauloFH]

@diegosouzapw this one-commit fix restores the helpers omitted during the #11388 squash and unblocks the Turbopack failures on release PR #11442. GitHub is requiring maintainer approval before the fork workflows can run.

[Copilot]

🟡 Changes recommended

The PR description does not include a passing npm run test:coverage result (required gate), so approval should wait for that confirmation (CI or author-run).

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Pull request overview

Restores the live WebSocket URL helper utilities in src/shared/utils/wsPath.ts, unblocking existing client imports (notably Turbopack) and re-establishing the handshake-driven runtime port/path resolution needed for prebuilt images.

Changes:

• Re-introduces sanitizeLiveWsPort() to safely accept only integer ports in the 1–65535 range.
• Re-introduces resolveLiveWsUrl() to apply handshake-reported publicUrl / port / path onto the compiled-in default URL with clear precedence rules.
• Keeps behavior aligned with the existing regression test suite (tests/unit/live-ws-url-11331.test.ts) that imports and exercises these helpers.

File summaries

File	Description
src/shared/utils/wsPath.ts	Restores missing live WS URL helpers so the dashboard can honor handshake-reported port/path and existing imports no longer fail.

Review details

• Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
• Comments generated: 0
• Review effort level: Lite

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.