-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vof momentum monitoring #1073
Vof momentum monitoring #1073
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice to have this new feature!
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ Running on 1 MPI rank(s)... | |||
---------------------- | |||
VOF Mass Conservation | |||
---------------------- | |||
time surface_fluid_0 mass_per_length_fluid_0 surface_fluid_1 mass_per_length_fluid_1 sharpening_threshold | |||
0.0000e+00 6.5778e-01 7.8933e-01 3.4222e-01 3.4222e+02 5.0000e-01 | |||
time surface_fluid_0 mass_per_length_fluid_0 momentum-x_fluid_0 momentum-y_fluid_0 surface_fluid_1 mass_per_length_fluid_1 momentum-x_fluid_1 momentum-y_fluid_1 sharpening_threshold |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could it be useful to have to have the total mass and total momentum output as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Someone can easily calculate those by adding the two columns in their own script. I'm not sure this is necessary :)
Co-authored-by: hepap <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great addition! Thanks! :)
Co-authored-by: Amishga Alphonius <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Amishga Alphonius <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Amishga Alphonius <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Amishga Alphonius <[email protected]>
Description of the problem For some cases we are running, it is relevant to monitor both the mass and the momentum in VOF simulations Description of the solution Add momentum monitoring to the mass monitoring. I don't think it's worth it to make multiple files, instead I appended the information to the existing file. How Has This Been Tested? Tested on some of our regular benchmark and the results make sense. Documentation Updated documentation accordingly Future changes The parameter monitor mass conservation is maybe not the most appropriate right now, but I don't want to break the prm file in this PR. We could have a parameter called monitor conservation instead, of maybe monitoring mass and momentum, but i 'd rather postpone this change because it's only esthetics Co-authored-by: hepap <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Amishga Alphonius <[email protected]> Former-commit-id: 73306f4
Description of the problem For some cases we are running, it is relevant to monitor both the mass and the momentum in VOF simulations Description of the solution Add momentum monitoring to the mass monitoring. I don't think it's worth it to make multiple files, instead I appended the information to the existing file. How Has This Been Tested? Tested on some of our regular benchmark and the results make sense. Documentation Updated documentation accordingly Future changes The parameter monitor mass conservation is maybe not the most appropriate right now, but I don't want to break the prm file in this PR. We could have a parameter called monitor conservation instead, of maybe monitoring mass and momentum, but i 'd rather postpone this change because it's only esthetics Co-authored-by: hepap <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Amishga Alphonius <[email protected]> Former-commit-id: 73306f4
Description of the problem
Description of the solution
How Has This Been Tested?
Documentation
Future changes