Files regarding Baklava update to CR8#9899
Merged
Conversation
m-chrzan
reviewed
Sep 30, 2022
Collaborator
Author
|
Pasting the output of check versions here |
martinvol
commented
Oct 12, 2022
martinvol
commented
Oct 12, 2022
martinvol
commented
Oct 12, 2022
b94ac2a to
913a450
Compare
martinvol
commented
Oct 12, 2022
pahor167
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Baklava was stuck in CR3 because it wasn't able to pass governance proposals. One that issue was fixed, a governance proposal was passed to speed run it to CR8 in one go. This is unconventional, as in mainnet Contract Releases go 1-by-1. Thus this will be one of the few proposals on Baklava that are unique, as they didn't pass in any other testnet.
To generate this file, the standard tooling described here was used, but the versions where set accordingly (rather than N+1, using the notation of the documentation). The tooling didn't have any issue processing this.
Note that ExchangeBRL.sol has different arguments than when ExchangeBRL was originally deploy on tesnets and mainnet, that is because this PR was deployed in-between.
Version diff reports and release data are committed in this PR for future reference.
Other changes
N/A
Tested
In Baklava iteself.
Related issues
Backwards compatibility
None
Documentation
The description of this PR itself.