-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: correct command of binary file #3467
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe update involves a modification in the command name used in the project documentation, specifically in the Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (1)
Additional Context UsedLanguageTool (4)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (4)
x/blob/README.md (4)
Line range hint
14-14
: Repeated word "the" detected.- a block producer separates the the `sdk.Tx` from the blob(s). + a block producer separates the `sdk.Tx` from the blob(s).
Line range hint
25-25
: Consider adding commas around the adverbial phrase for clarity.- shares that compose their original data do in fact exist in a particular block. + shares that compose their original data do, in fact, exist in a particular block.
Line range hint
31-31
: Grammatical error: "it's" should be "its" when indicating possession.- The blob module doesn't maintain it's own state outside of two params. + The blob module doesn't maintain its own state outside of two params.
Line range hint
135-135
: Unpaired symbol: ‘]’ seems to be missing in the markdown link.- in [Generating the Share Commitment](./README.md#generating-the-sharecommitment) + in [Generating the Share Commitment](./README.md#generating-the-share-commitment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
omg how did this typo survive for so long
Overview