Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 7, 2021. It is now read-only.

Replace kaniko with docker build #362

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2019
Merged

Replace kaniko with docker build #362

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2019

Conversation

sleepycat
Copy link
Contributor

Kaniko builds a bit faster and simplifies cloudbuild config a little by
automatically pushing images. Unfortunately it seems to build images that have
missing files, which then causes breakage downstream.
As an example:
GoogleContainerTools/kaniko#362

@sastels sastels temporarily deployed to rac-prototype-pr-362 June 21, 2019 23:07 Inactive
@sleepycat sleepycat requested a review from sastels June 21, 2019 23:44
@@ -37,12 +37,20 @@ steps:
- 'MINIO_SECRET_KEY=$_MINIO_SECRET_KEY'
- 'MINIO_BUCKET_NAME=$_MINIO_BUCKET_NAME'

- name: gcr.io/kaniko-project/executor:debug
- name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/docker'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need the quotes? or is that just Prettier?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There isn't really a good reason for that. I'll get rid of it.

Copy link
Contributor

@sastels sastels left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

just changing api, not frontend?

Kaniko builds a bit faster and simplifies cloudbuild config a little by
automatically pushing images. Unfortunately it seems to build images that have
missing files, which then causes breakage downstream.
As an example:
GoogleContainerTools/kaniko#362
@sleepycat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah I ran into similar problems there too and changed it before.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants