You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 3, 2019. It is now read-only.
Arrow functions are the first feature from ES6 that we're trying to introduce into trace viewer. Based on this thread, I don't think that anyone has any real objections to using arrow functions as long as they work with all of our dependents.
Because they're the first ES6 feature that we're introducing, we need to be extra careful to make sure that we don't break anything downstream in an unanticipated way. I've submitted https://codereview.chromium.org/1358233002/ as a means of introducing arrow functions in a very core part of the code that should break any dependents in an easily-revertable way.
If, in a couple of weeks, nothing has blown up, we should be able to start using arrow functions throughout the codebase.
I suppose arrow functions can now (after more than 2 weeks of no downstream breakage reports) be marked as "stable". Perhaps we should have a Catapult guide on which ES6 features are considered "safe".
Arrow functions are the first feature from ES6 that we're trying to introduce into trace viewer. Based on this thread, I don't think that anyone has any real objections to using arrow functions as long as they work with all of our dependents.
Because they're the first ES6 feature that we're introducing, we need to be extra careful to make sure that we don't break anything downstream in an unanticipated way. I've submitted https://codereview.chromium.org/1358233002/ as a means of introducing arrow functions in a very core part of the code that should break any dependents in an easily-revertable way.
If, in a couple of weeks, nothing has blown up, we should be able to start using arrow functions throughout the codebase.
cc: @natduca @eakuefner @petrcermak
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: