Max parallel jobs = 2. Slower, but more runner freedom.

[noonio]

Hack to avoid using all our runners on these tasks.

[github-actions]

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at	2024-09-11 09:22:56.707533554 UTC
Max. memory units	14000000
Max. CPU units	10000000000
Max. tx size (kB)	16384

Script summary

Name	Hash	Size (Bytes)
νInitial	2fac819a1f4f14e29639d1414220d2a18b6abd6b8e444d88d0dda8ff	3799
νCommit	2043a9f1a685bcf491413a5f139ee42e335157c8c6bc8d9e4018669d	1743
νHead	2ee477c60839936be49a50030690865b5bed4db8cd2f05bf255ac680	10068
μHead	a1610f6e64843161f4a88229c0286176f5325de3e2f773eec2b1d818*	4508
νDeposit	c2117fd9ebdee3e96b81fd67ff7092d638926415c10f1f7e5a267ad0	2791

• The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	5096	5.71	2.25	0.44
2	5301	7.17	2.84	0.46
3	5499	8.37	3.30	0.48
5	5901	11.12	4.39	0.53
10	6907	18.21	7.20	0.65
57	16356	82.89	32.79	1.78

Commit transaction costs

This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.

UTxO	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	569	10.52	4.15	0.29
2	755	13.86	5.65	0.34
3	940	17.33	7.20	0.38
5	1319	24.65	10.44	0.48
10	2260	45.22	19.36	0.75
20	4129	95.99	40.76	1.40

CollectCom transaction costs

Parties	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	57	560	22.17	8.68	0.42
2	113	671	32.96	13.05	0.54
3	170	782	47.08	18.79	0.70
4	227	893	57.57	23.31	0.82
5	282	1004	75.57	30.73	1.03
6	339	1116	92.01	37.67	1.21

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	640	17.70	7.78	0.38
2	727	17.82	8.52	0.39
3	859	19.10	9.74	0.41
5	1248	25.40	13.68	0.51
10	1967	32.86	20.25	0.65
50	8014	98.99	75.15	1.84

Close transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	602	19.69	8.69	0.40
2	783	21.49	10.39	0.43
3	919	22.96	11.79	0.46
5	1352	26.67	15.32	0.54
10	2016	34.36	22.62	0.68
50	8096	98.07	83.36	1.90

Contest transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	671	25.89	11.13	0.47
2	892	28.10	13.02	0.51
3	964	29.49	14.19	0.53
5	1279	33.40	17.53	0.60
10	2001	42.91	25.67	0.77
40	6406	98.48	73.77	1.76

Abort transaction costs

There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	4991	17.43	7.58	0.57
2	5067	25.09	10.86	0.65
3	5226	41.66	18.36	0.85
4	5374	58.46	25.90	1.05
5	5443	74.51	33.03	1.23

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.

Parties	UTxO	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
5	0	0	4935	7.30	3.08	0.45
5	1	57	4968	8.83	3.96	0.47
5	5	284	5104	13.55	6.89	0.53
5	10	570	5274	18.81	10.28	0.61
5	20	1135	5610	30.52	17.57	0.77
5	30	1708	5955	42.04	24.77	0.93
5	40	2276	6292	52.98	31.73	1.08
5	50	2846	6633	64.51	38.94	1.24
5	81	4608	7681	99.56	61.02	1.73

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2024-09-11 09:26:02.488826203 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	3000
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	4.905382186
P99	9.628830349999998ms
P95	7.248170149999995ms
P50	4.514454000000001ms
Number of Invalid txs	0

Three local nodes

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	9000
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	25.288767151
P99	110.25439676000049ms
P95	34.7556047ms
P50	22.943684ms
Number of Invalid txs	0

[github-actions]

Test Results

490 tests  ±0   485 ✅ ±0   20m 0s ⏱️ -10s
155 suites ±0     5 💤 ±0 
  6 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit bbcc336. ± Comparison against base commit 7025d78.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[ch1bo]

I would not call this a hack, looks good.