Skip to content

CIP-0137 | Fix protocol specifications #21

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

CIP-0137 | Fix protocol specifications #21

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

@jpraynaud
Copy link
Member

@jpraynaud jpraynaud commented Oct 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

This PR includes updates of the CIP-0137:

  • The structure of the DMQ messages has evolved:
    • the message payload is encoded as an array and not any more in CBOR
    • the operational certificate is encoded as an array and not any more in CBOR, and its structure has been specified more precisely
    • the specification of the length of messages list is now stricter in the n2c local notification mini-protocol
    • removed a duplicate table
  • The implementation plan has been updated.

(latest version of updated document)

coot
coot approved these changes Oct 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coot coot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jpraynaud jpraynaud mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2025
Merged
@jpraynaud
Copy link
Member Author

jpraynaud commented Oct 14, 2025

Closing this PR which has been moved to cardano-foundation#1094

@jpraynaud jpraynaud closed this Oct 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@coot coot coot approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jpraynaud @coot