-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 217
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve bech32 coveralls #296
Conversation
6469e17
to
6845302
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, some "indentation" issues though.
] | ||
invalidChecksums :: [(ByteString, Bech32.DecodingError)] | ||
invalidChecksums = | ||
[ ( " 1nwldj5" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry to be annoying with this, but let's make this 4-space indent 😬 ... Have you configured your editor to pick up the configuration in .editorconfig
at the root of the project?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done. (I must have hit tab too many times...)
bors r+ |
6845302
to
99d3ed0
Compare
Canceled |
bors r+ |
1 similar comment
bors r+ |
283: Sqlite: add checkpoints and transactions to DBLayer r=KtorZ a=rvl Relates to issue #154. # Overview - Implemented saving and loading of transaction history to SQLite - Implemented saving and loading of wallet checkpoints to SQLite, including the state for sequential scheme address discovery. # Comments - The SqliteSpec testing is a bit light. However, there should be enough implemented for all the DBSpec tests to work. Also I plan to finish the QSM tests tomorrow which should provide even more coverage. - Cascading deletes are not working with persistent-sqlite, which is annoying. - DB indexes are missing on some fields. (Needs some custom SQL, can be fixed later) 289: show feature availability in API specification r=KtorZ a=KtorZ # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> N/A # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [ ] I have removed the"priority" from the specification and added a "status" indicating the availability of a particular feature in the API. # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> As requested by Chris. Makes it easier for externals to know what's available or not. A preview: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074137-bdc26f00-7ba4-11e9-95b5-33ff723e0f2a.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074150-c6b34080-7ba4-11e9-83a5-943877e14fd7.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074161-cfa41200-7ba4-11e9-8d83-0948b129e856.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074177-dd599780-7ba4-11e9-867e-5047012b1f93.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074188-e5193c00-7ba4-11e9-845c-cacfd34a9fc9.png) <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> 292: Fix Change Calculation (#286) r=KtorZ a=KtorZ # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> #286 # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [x] I have extended our test to capture the issue highlighted in the bug - [x] I have looked at the test failing - [x] I have fixed the calculation of the change which was... weirdly way off the specification.. # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> 296: Improve bech32 coveralls r=KtorZ a=piotr-iohk # Issue Number <!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles --> # Overview <!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR --> - [ ] I have replaced `isLeft` with `Left ...` here and there to improve coveralls score a bit # Comments <!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any --> <!-- Don't forget to: ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through ✓ Assign yourself to the PR ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s) ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki --> Co-authored-by: Rodney Lorrimar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pawel Jakubas <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: KtorZ <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Piotr Stachyra <[email protected]>
Issue Number
Overview
isLeft
withLeft ...
here and there to improve coveralls score a bitComments