Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve bech32 coveralls #296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2019
Merged

Improve bech32 coveralls #296

merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2019

Conversation

piotr-iohk
Copy link
Contributor

Issue Number

Overview

  • I have replaced isLeft with Left ... here and there to improve coveralls score a bit

Comments

@piotr-iohk piotr-iohk self-assigned this May 21, 2019
@piotr-iohk piotr-iohk force-pushed the piotr/238/qa-review branch from 6469e17 to 6845302 Compare May 21, 2019 10:00
@piotr-iohk piotr-iohk mentioned this pull request May 21, 2019
Copy link
Member

@KtorZ KtorZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, some "indentation" issues though.

]
invalidChecksums :: [(ByteString, Bech32.DecodingError)]
invalidChecksums =
[ ( " 1nwldj5"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry to be annoying with this, but let's make this 4-space indent 😬 ... Have you configured your editor to pick up the configuration in .editorconfig at the root of the project?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done. (I must have hit tab too many times...)

@KtorZ
Copy link
Member

KtorZ commented May 21, 2019

bors r+

@piotr-iohk piotr-iohk force-pushed the piotr/238/qa-review branch from 6845302 to 99d3ed0 Compare May 21, 2019 11:10
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented May 21, 2019

Canceled

@piotr-iohk
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r+

1 similar comment
@KtorZ
Copy link
Member

KtorZ commented May 21, 2019

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2019
283: Sqlite: add checkpoints and transactions to DBLayer r=KtorZ a=rvl

Relates to issue #154.

# Overview

- Implemented saving and loading of transaction history to SQLite
- Implemented saving and loading of wallet checkpoints to SQLite, including the state for sequential scheme address discovery.

# Comments

- The SqliteSpec testing is a bit light. However, there should be enough implemented for all the DBSpec tests to work. Also I plan to finish the QSM tests tomorrow which should provide even more coverage.
- Cascading deletes are not working with persistent-sqlite, which is annoying.
- DB indexes are missing on some fields. (Needs some custom SQL, can be fixed later)


289: show feature availability in API specification r=KtorZ a=KtorZ

# Issue Number

<!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles -->

N/A

# Overview

<!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR -->

- [ ] I have removed the"priority" from the specification and added a "status" indicating the availability of a particular feature in the API.

# Comments

<!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any -->

As requested by Chris. Makes it easier for externals to know what's available or not. 

A preview:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074137-bdc26f00-7ba4-11e9-95b5-33ff723e0f2a.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074150-c6b34080-7ba4-11e9-83a5-943877e14fd7.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074161-cfa41200-7ba4-11e9-8d83-0948b129e856.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074177-dd599780-7ba4-11e9-867e-5047012b1f93.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5680256/58074188-e5193c00-7ba4-11e9-845c-cacfd34a9fc9.png)

<!-- 
Don't forget to:

 ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through
 ✓ Assign yourself to the PR
 ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s)
 ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket
 ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki
-->


292: Fix Change Calculation (#286) r=KtorZ a=KtorZ

# Issue Number

<!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles -->

#286 

# Overview

<!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR -->

- [x] I have extended our test to capture the issue highlighted in the bug
- [x] I have looked at the test failing
- [x] I have fixed the calculation of the change which was... weirdly way off the specification..

# Comments

<!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any -->

<!-- 
Don't forget to:

 ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through
 ✓ Assign yourself to the PR
 ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s)
 ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket
 ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki
-->


296: Improve bech32 coveralls r=KtorZ a=piotr-iohk

# Issue Number

<!-- Put here a reference to the issue this PR relates to and which requirements it tackles -->


# Overview

<!-- Detail in a few bullet points the work accomplished in this PR -->

- [ ] I have replaced `isLeft` with `Left ...` here and there to improve coveralls score a bit


# Comments

<!-- Additional comments or screenshots to attach if any -->

<!-- 
Don't forget to:

 ✓ Self-review your changes to make sure nothing unexpected slipped through
 ✓ Assign yourself to the PR
 ✓ Assign one or several reviewer(s)
 ✓ Once created, link this PR to its corresponding ticket
 ✓ Acknowledge any changes required to the Wiki
-->


Co-authored-by: Rodney Lorrimar <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pawel Jakubas <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: KtorZ <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Piotr Stachyra <[email protected]>
@KtorZ KtorZ merged commit 624c035 into master May 21, 2019
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the piotr/238/qa-review branch May 21, 2019 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants