-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
AST-27 Desugar objects and functions into let #188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e33f447
Let returns it RHS
rossberg c860fb0
WIP
rossberg 1b493ab
AST FuncD -> FuncE
rossberg 12ac11f
Remove grammar hacks
rossberg cef9266
Merge branch 'master' into let
nomeata ff7d689
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into let
nomeata 2e6caa5
Leave note in definedness check that it is too permissive for actors
nomeata cb960ee
Implement letD using letP
nomeata abdedf9
Resurrect use-before-define5.as
nomeata 0c3acd6
Update test output
nomeata 9e9dcef
Really update test output
nomeata 5efabdc
Arrange: FuncE, not FuncD
nomeata d82432c
Jira link
nomeata File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this deliberate? Joachim, have you changed the IR letD to also return the value of rhs?This contradics Andreas first comment on the PR:
" Note that it's not necessary for Ir.LetD to return values, since that is taken care fo by desugaring. After FuncD is replaced with FuncE in the IR, all non-ExpD decs should have type () there"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I guess I was confused when I wrote that. But I am fixing this in #196 in any case (including
Check_ir), so it’s fine for now if we merge both.In fact, I want to refactor
BlockEfurther to(dec list * exp), and then declarations have no type at all (which means less to check inCheck_irand worry about inConstruct).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both sound good