Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove target conf limit on listsinceblock txs. #266

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2015

Conversation

jrick
Copy link
Member

@jrick jrick commented May 6, 2015

All transactions since the specified block (or the genesis block if
left unspecified) should be included in the result array

Along with this fix, update the help descriptions to mention that the
target confirmations parameter is not considered when including
transactions in the result object. That is, transactions with a
height greater than the height of the lastblock in the result object
are still included.

Fixes #263.

@jrick jrick force-pushed the jrick_listsinceblock branch from d58f8f0 to 417a053 Compare May 6, 2015 20:41
@davecgh
Copy link
Member

davecgh commented May 13, 2015

OK

@jrick jrick force-pushed the jrick_listsinceblock branch from 417a053 to 41b7d4c Compare May 13, 2015 15:43
@conformal-deploy conformal-deploy merged commit 41b7d4c into btcsuite:master May 13, 2015
All transactions since the specified block (or the genesis block if
left unspecified) should be included in the result array

Along with this fix, update the help descriptions to mention that the
target confirmations parameter is not considered when including
transactions in the result object.  That is, transactions with a
height greater than the height of the lastblock in the result object
are still included.

Fixes btcsuite#263.
@jrick jrick deleted the jrick_listsinceblock branch May 13, 2015 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

listsinceblock seems to miss unconfirmed transactions
3 participants