-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(docs): add security policy #1758
Conversation
WalkthroughA new security policy document (.github/SECURITY.md) has been added for the Terraform Provider for Proxmox. The document outlines the process and requirements for vulnerability reports, establishes the supported version policy for security patches, and details security best practices including API credentials, network measures, and state file security. It also specifies response times, disclosure procedures, and reporting guidelines via private channels like email or GitHub Security Advisories. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Reporter
participant SecurityTeam
participant ReleaseProcess
Reporter->>SecurityTeam: Submit vulnerability report (via email/GitHub Advisory)
SecurityTeam-->>Reporter: Acknowledge report (within 48 hours)
SecurityTeam->>SecurityTeam: Audit the issue and prepare a fix
SecurityTeam->>ReleaseProcess: Deploy the security patch
ReleaseProcess-->>Reporter: Notify users of the update
Suggested labels
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/SECURITY.md (3)
3-12
: Supported Versions Table: Clarify Version LabelingThe table is structured well, but the label "| < Previous minor release | ❌ |" may be ambiguous. Consider rephrasing it to something like "| Older than previous minor release | ❌ |" for improved clarity.
Proposed diff:
-| < Previous minor release | :x: | +| Older than previous minor release | :x: |
19-25
: Reporting Instructions: Improve Email PresentationThe instructions suggest sending an email for vulnerability reports; however, representing the email address as a clickable mailto link can enhance user experience and clarity.
Consider changing:
Instead, please send an email to [email protected] or report it…
to:
Instead, please send an email to [email protected] or report it…Proposed diff:
-Instead, please send an email to <[email protected]> or report it through GitHub's Security Advisory feature: +Instead, please send an email to [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) or report it through GitHub's Security Advisory feature:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~19-~19: Consider using “email”.
Context: ...s, or pull requests.** Instead, please send an email to [email protected] or ...(SEND_AN_EMAIL)
70-76
: Additional Information: Link Formatting SuggestionThe final section provides valuable external resources. For consistency with common Markdown practice, consider removing the extra angle brackets in the link URLs. For example:
- Terraform Security Best Practices
could be changed to:
- Terraform Security Best Practices
This change is optional and based on your stylistic preferences.Proposed diff:
- - [Terraform Security Best Practices](<https://www.terraform.io/docs/cloud/guides/recommended-practices/security.html>) - - [Proxmox Security Documentation](<https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-ve/security>) + - [Terraform Security Best Practices](https://www.terraform.io/docs/cloud/guides/recommended-practices/security.html) + - [Proxmox Security Documentation](https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-ve/security)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/SECURITY.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/SECURITY.md
[style] ~19-~19: Consider using “email”.
Context: ...s, or pull requests.** Instead, please send an email to [email protected] or ...
(SEND_AN_EMAIL)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: qodana
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/SECURITY.md (6)
1-2
: Title and Introduction: Looks GoodThe document title "# Security Policy" immediately makes the purpose clear. There are no issues with the introduction.
13-18
: Reporting a Vulnerability Section: Clear MessagingThe section clearly communicates the importance of confidential reporting for security vulnerabilities. No changes are necessary here.
26-33
: Reporting Details: Comprehensive and ClearThe bullet list of required information (description, reproduction steps, potential impact, suggested fix, and optional credit) is comprehensive and well organized.
34-41
: What to Expect Section: Expectations are Well DefinedThe guidelines for report acknowledgment, update frequency, and credit are clear and set appropriate expectations.
42-50
: Disclosure Policy: Succinct and ActionableThe Disclosure Policy section clearly lists the steps taken upon receiving a security report. This clarity is beneficial for both reporters and maintainers.
51-69
: Security-Related Configuration: Best Practices OutlinedThe configuration guidelines for API credentials, network security, and state file security are all properly detailed. The instructions are actionable and follow security best practices.
This commit introduces a detailed SECURITY.md file that outlines: - Supported version policy for security patches - Vulnerability reporting process - Disclosure and handling procedures - Security best practices for using the provider - Additional security resources and references The new security policy provides clear guidance for users and contributors on how security issues are managed and mitigated. Signed-off-by: Pavel Boldyrev <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/SECURITY.md (4)
1-2
: Document Title and Introduction:
The title "Security Policy" is clear and sets the appropriate context for the document. Consider including a brief introductory sentence or summary immediately below the title that reinforces the document’s scope and importance.
34-41
: What to Expect Section:
The section on what reporters can expect after submitting their report is clear, particularly with the specified acknowledgment timeframe. As a suggestion, consider briefly noting any escalation steps or alternative contacts if no acknowledgment is received within the stated period.
42-50
: Disclosure Policy Section:
The disclosure policy is clearly laid out, with a numbered list that guides the reader through the process. You might consider adding an estimated timeline for fix deployment or referencing a support page, which could further set clear expectations for affected users.
51-69
: Security-Related Configuration Best Practices:
This section does a great job outlining best practices for API credentials, network security, and state file security. For future improvements, you might include additional hardening measures (for example, multi-factor authentication or enhanced logging practices) if applicable to the provider’s deployment contexts.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/SECURITY.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/SECURITY.md
[style] ~19-~19: Consider using “email”.
Context: ...s, or pull requests.** Instead, please send an email to [[email protected]](mai...
(SEND_AN_EMAIL)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: qodana
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/SECURITY.md (5)
3-12
: Supported Versions Section:
The "Supported Versions" section is well-formatted and the table clearly outlines which releases receive security patches. This concise presentation makes it easy for users to understand the support boundaries.
13-18
: Reporting a Vulnerability (Introduction):
This section effectively communicates the seriousness of security vulnerabilities and instructs reporters to avoid using public channels. The emphasis using bold text is appropriate.
19-25
: Vulnerability Reporting Steps:
The step-by-step instructions for reporting a vulnerability via email or GitHub’s Security Advisory feature are clear. Please verify that the provided email address ([email protected]) is correct and actively monitored to ensure prompt handling of reports.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~19-~19: Consider using “email”.
Context: ...s, or pull requests.** Instead, please send an email to [[email protected]](mai...(SEND_AN_EMAIL)
26-33
: Vulnerability Report Checklist:
The checklist outlining the information to include in vulnerability reports is comprehensive and easy to follow. Maintaining a clear, bullet-point format here helps ensure that reporters provide all necessary details.
70-76
: Additional Information and References:
The additional resource links to Terraform’s and Proxmox’s documentation are a valuable inclusion. Be sure to periodically verify that these external links remain current as documentation and security practices evolve over time.
This commit introduces a detailed SECURITY.md file that outlines:
The new security policy provides clear guidance for users and contributors on how security issues are managed and mitigated.
Contributor's Note
/docs
for any user-facing features or additions./fwprovider/tests
for any new or updated resources / data sources.make example
to verify that the change works as expected.Proof of Work
Community Note
Closes #0000 | Relates #0000
Summary by CodeRabbit