Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(docs): add security policy #1758

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025
Merged

chore(docs): add security policy #1758

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

bpg
Copy link
Owner

@bpg bpg commented Feb 10, 2025

This commit introduces a detailed SECURITY.md file that outlines:

  • Supported version policy for security patches
  • Vulnerability reporting process
  • Disclosure and handling procedures
  • Security best practices for using the provider
  • Additional security resources and references

The new security policy provides clear guidance for users and contributors on how security issues are managed and mitigated.

Contributor's Note

  • I have added / updated documentation in /docs for any user-facing features or additions.
  • I have added / updated acceptance tests in /fwprovider/tests for any new or updated resources / data sources.
  • I have ran make example to verify that the change works as expected.

Proof of Work

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Closes #0000 | Relates #0000

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Introduced a comprehensive security policy. The policy outlines security patch support, provides a private, structured process for vulnerability reporting, and offers best practices for safely managing sensitive information, network connections, and state files.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

A new security policy document (.github/SECURITY.md) has been added for the Terraform Provider for Proxmox. The document outlines the process and requirements for vulnerability reports, establishes the supported version policy for security patches, and details security best practices including API credentials, network measures, and state file security. It also specifies response times, disclosure procedures, and reporting guidelines via private channels like email or GitHub Security Advisories.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/SECURITY.md New document added detailing the vulnerability reporting process, supported patch release versions, disclosure procedures, and security best practices.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Reporter
    participant SecurityTeam
    participant ReleaseProcess

    Reporter->>SecurityTeam: Submit vulnerability report (via email/GitHub Advisory)
    SecurityTeam-->>Reporter: Acknowledge report (within 48 hours)
    SecurityTeam->>SecurityTeam: Audit the issue and prepare a fix
    SecurityTeam->>ReleaseProcess: Deploy the security patch
    ReleaseProcess-->>Reporter: Notify users of the update
Loading

Suggested labels

size/XS


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/SECURITY.md (3)

3-12: Supported Versions Table: Clarify Version Labeling

The table is structured well, but the label "| < Previous minor release | ❌ |" may be ambiguous. Consider rephrasing it to something like "| Older than previous minor release | ❌ |" for improved clarity.

Proposed diff:

-| < Previous minor release   | :x:                |
+| Older than previous minor release | :x:                |

19-25: Reporting Instructions: Improve Email Presentation

The instructions suggest sending an email for vulnerability reports; however, representing the email address as a clickable mailto link can enhance user experience and clarity.
Consider changing:
  Instead, please send an email to [email protected] or report it…
to:
  Instead, please send an email to [email protected] or report it…

Proposed diff:

-Instead, please send an email to <[email protected]> or report it through GitHub's Security Advisory feature:
+Instead, please send an email to [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) or report it through GitHub's Security Advisory feature:
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~19-~19: Consider using “email”.
Context: ...s, or pull requests.** Instead, please send an email to [email protected] or ...

(SEND_AN_EMAIL)


70-76: Additional Information: Link Formatting Suggestion

The final section provides valuable external resources. For consistency with common Markdown practice, consider removing the extra angle brackets in the link URLs. For example:
  - Terraform Security Best Practices
could be changed to:
  - Terraform Security Best Practices
This change is optional and based on your stylistic preferences.

Proposed diff:

- - [Terraform Security Best Practices](<https://www.terraform.io/docs/cloud/guides/recommended-practices/security.html>)
- - [Proxmox Security Documentation](<https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-ve/security>)
+ - [Terraform Security Best Practices](https://www.terraform.io/docs/cloud/guides/recommended-practices/security.html)
+ - [Proxmox Security Documentation](https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-ve/security)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c0c79b and 014f1b7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/SECURITY.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/SECURITY.md

[style] ~19-~19: Consider using “email”.
Context: ...s, or pull requests.** Instead, please send an email to [email protected] or ...

(SEND_AN_EMAIL)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: qodana
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/SECURITY.md (6)

1-2: Title and Introduction: Looks Good

The document title "# Security Policy" immediately makes the purpose clear. There are no issues with the introduction.


13-18: Reporting a Vulnerability Section: Clear Messaging

The section clearly communicates the importance of confidential reporting for security vulnerabilities. No changes are necessary here.


26-33: Reporting Details: Comprehensive and Clear

The bullet list of required information (description, reproduction steps, potential impact, suggested fix, and optional credit) is comprehensive and well organized.


34-41: What to Expect Section: Expectations are Well Defined

The guidelines for report acknowledgment, update frequency, and credit are clear and set appropriate expectations.


42-50: Disclosure Policy: Succinct and Actionable

The Disclosure Policy section clearly lists the steps taken upon receiving a security report. This clarity is beneficial for both reporters and maintainers.


51-69: Security-Related Configuration: Best Practices Outlined

The configuration guidelines for API credentials, network security, and state file security are all properly detailed. The instructions are actionable and follow security best practices.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Feb 10, 2025
This commit introduces a detailed SECURITY.md file that outlines:
- Supported version policy for security patches
- Vulnerability reporting process
- Disclosure and handling procedures
- Security best practices for using the provider
- Additional security resources and references

The new security policy provides clear guidance for users and contributors on how security issues are managed and mitigated.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Boldyrev <[email protected]>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/SECURITY.md (4)

1-2: Document Title and Introduction:
The title "Security Policy" is clear and sets the appropriate context for the document. Consider including a brief introductory sentence or summary immediately below the title that reinforces the document’s scope and importance.


34-41: What to Expect Section:
The section on what reporters can expect after submitting their report is clear, particularly with the specified acknowledgment timeframe. As a suggestion, consider briefly noting any escalation steps or alternative contacts if no acknowledgment is received within the stated period.


42-50: Disclosure Policy Section:
The disclosure policy is clearly laid out, with a numbered list that guides the reader through the process. You might consider adding an estimated timeline for fix deployment or referencing a support page, which could further set clear expectations for affected users.


51-69: Security-Related Configuration Best Practices:
This section does a great job outlining best practices for API credentials, network security, and state file security. For future improvements, you might include additional hardening measures (for example, multi-factor authentication or enhanced logging practices) if applicable to the provider’s deployment contexts.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 014f1b7 and 7771ff5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/SECURITY.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/SECURITY.md

[style] ~19-~19: Consider using “email”.
Context: ...s, or pull requests.** Instead, please send an email to [[email protected]](mai...

(SEND_AN_EMAIL)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: qodana
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/SECURITY.md (5)

3-12: Supported Versions Section:
The "Supported Versions" section is well-formatted and the table clearly outlines which releases receive security patches. This concise presentation makes it easy for users to understand the support boundaries.


13-18: Reporting a Vulnerability (Introduction):
This section effectively communicates the seriousness of security vulnerabilities and instructs reporters to avoid using public channels. The emphasis using bold text is appropriate.


19-25: Vulnerability Reporting Steps:
The step-by-step instructions for reporting a vulnerability via email or GitHub’s Security Advisory feature are clear. Please verify that the provided email address ([email protected]) is correct and actively monitored to ensure prompt handling of reports.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~19-~19: Consider using “email”.
Context: ...s, or pull requests.** Instead, please send an email to [[email protected]](mai...

(SEND_AN_EMAIL)


26-33: Vulnerability Report Checklist:
The checklist outlining the information to include in vulnerability reports is comprehensive and easy to follow. Maintaining a clear, bullet-point format here helps ensure that reporters provide all necessary details.


70-76: Additional Information and References:
The additional resource links to Terraform’s and Proxmox’s documentation are a valuable inclusion. Be sure to periodically verify that these external links remain current as documentation and security practices evolve over time.

@bpg bpg merged commit cbff3e4 into main Feb 10, 2025
7 checks passed
@bpg bpg deleted the add-security.md branch February 10, 2025 03:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant