Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

runc: upgrade to 1.0.0-rc92 #1026

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2020
Merged

Conversation

etungsten
Copy link
Contributor

@etungsten etungsten commented Aug 11, 2020

Issue number:
N/A

Description of changes:
Upgrades runc to v1.0.0-rc92

Testing done:
Built x86 images for all aws-k8s-* variants. All nodes come up fine, can run pods fine.

ip-192-168-30-151.us-west-2.compute.internal   Ready    <none>   4m8s    v1.17.9
ip-192-168-5-29.us-west-2.compute.internal     Ready    <none>   24m     v1.16.13
ip-192-168-9-222.us-west-2.compute.internal    Ready    <none>   43m     v1.15.12

Building arm64 images to test...

Terms of contribution:

By submitting this pull request, I agree that this contribution is dual-licensed under the terms of both the Apache License, version 2.0, and the MIT license.

Copy link
Contributor

@tjkirch tjkirch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming everything tests ok!

Copy link
Contributor

@samuelkarp samuelkarp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tested the aws-dev and aws-ecs-1 variants and both appear to be working properly.

@etungsten etungsten marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2020 04:14
@etungsten etungsten merged commit 8b38f52 into bottlerocket-os:develop Aug 11, 2020
@etungsten etungsten deleted the runc-update branch August 11, 2020 05:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants