Skip to content

Conversation

akumta
Copy link
Contributor

@akumta akumta commented Nov 30, 2016

No description provided.

@akrzemi1
Copy link
Member

I have put those guards, because Boost.Optional unit tests were failing on Sun OS compiler. Apparently it does not provide a full support for C++ language features.

I would not consider it a good idea to enable Boost.Optional interface that relies on the features that are not implemented, or implemented incorrectly in a given compiler.

Did you try to run the Boost.Optional unit tests after applying your fix locally? Do they pass?

@akumta
Copy link
Contributor Author

akumta commented Nov 30, 2016

Let me run some more tests locally and perhaps put the guards around the latest compiler.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants