Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow prefix and postfix text on relationships and taxonomies input field #2990

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Dec 2, 2021

Conversation

nestordedios
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #2989

Copy link
Member

@I-Valchev I-Valchev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @nestordedios,
Good issue and good PR! :-)

The formatting of the prefix is certainly quite specific. This here and the one in https://github.com/bolt/core/blob/master/templates/_partials/fields/_base.html.twig#L123-L132 are quite similar. Is it a good idea to put them in a macro that is used in both places?

@nestordedios
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hey @I-Valchev, yes I agree!

I'll work on it and and update the PR 👍

Copy link
Member

@I-Valchev I-Valchev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Nice! Thanks @nestordedios

@I-Valchev I-Valchev changed the base branch from 5.0 to master December 2, 2021 10:58
Copy link
Member

@bobdenotter bobdenotter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 👍

@bobdenotter bobdenotter merged commit 2706518 into master Dec 2, 2021
@bobdenotter bobdenotter deleted the prefix-postfix-relations branch December 2, 2021 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Prefix and postfix text options are not visible on relationships and taxonomies
3 participants