Skip to content

Support Layer Zero bridge from Alt L1s to Ethereum#400

Merged
boyuan-chen merged 2 commits intoalt-l1from
alt-l1-support-layer-zero
Oct 5, 2022
Merged

Support Layer Zero bridge from Alt L1s to Ethereum#400
boyuan-chen merged 2 commits intoalt-l1from
alt-l1-support-layer-zero

Conversation

@boyuan-chen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@boyuan-chen boyuan-chen commented Oct 4, 2022

📋 Add associated issues, tickets, docs URL here.

Overview

Describe what your Pull Request is about in a few sentences.

Allow users to bridge BOBA tokens from Alt L1s to Ethereum

Changes

Describe your changes and implementation choices. More details make PRs easier to review.

  • Deploy Layer Zero apis
  • Add warning message if the balance is not enough
  • Fix names in history tab

Testing

Describe how to test your new feature/bug fix and if possible, a step by step guide on how to demo this.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Oct 5, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 81.17% // Head: 49.89% // Decreases project coverage by -31.27% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (710baad) compared to base (16a473c).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           alt-l1     #400       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   81.17%   49.89%   -31.28%     
===========================================
  Files          54      103       +49     
  Lines        1684     3982     +2298     
  Branches      271      795      +524     
===========================================
+ Hits         1367     1987      +620     
- Misses        317     1995     +1678     
Flag Coverage Δ
boba-contracts 26.47% <ø> (?)
contracts 79.54% <ø> (ø)
core-utils 86.80% <ø> (ø)
data-transport-layer 31.17% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ages/boba/contracts/contracts/BobaFixedSavings.sol 86.27% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/boba/contracts/contracts/WBOBA9.sol 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/boba/contracts/contracts/AtomicSwap.sol 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/data-transport-layer/src/utils/eth-tx.ts 85.71% <0.00%> (ø)
...s/boba/contracts/contracts/bridges/L1NFTBridge.sol 36.47% <0.00%> (ø)
.../contracts/contracts/lzTokenBridge/lzApp/LzLib.sol 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...boba/contracts/contracts/oracle/FluxAggregator.sol 62.13% <0.00%> (ø)
...ba/contracts/contracts/DAO/governance/Timelock.sol 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...contracts/contracts/standards/L1StandardERC721.sol 41.17% <0.00%> (ø)
...ackages/boba/contracts/contracts/ERC721Genesis.sol 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 39 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@boyuan-chen boyuan-chen merged commit 147e8f2 into alt-l1 Oct 5, 2022
@boyuan-chen boyuan-chen deleted the alt-l1-support-layer-zero branch October 5, 2022 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants