Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow for s3 endpoint param #82

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2018

Conversation

apbodnar
Copy link
Contributor

@apbodnar apbodnar commented Sep 2, 2016

I want to be able to use s3 transfer accelerated buckets with s4cmd. Boto3 allows for this by configuring a endpoint_url in the s3 client. With this change, I can enable s3 transfer acceleration by using --endpoint-url=http://s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com

@nglange
Copy link

nglange commented Dec 7, 2016

@chouhanyang: Is it possible to merge this PR?

@Moulick
Copy link

Moulick commented Sep 11, 2017

This would be really useful. DigitalOcean has also started their Object-Storage service that works flawlessly with s3cmd. Only thing stopping S4cmd form working with DigitalOcean and other providers is the 'endpoint_url'.

@wachpwnski
Copy link

Someone apply this patch it has saved me a lot of trouble, and I don't see it negatively affecting anything else upstream. Thank you @apbodnar for doing the work on this.

@cgroschupp
Copy link

@chouhanyang can you please merge this pr?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 3, 2018

Why was this not yet merged? :)

@BeckZero
Copy link

+1 T.T

@rozuur
Copy link
Contributor

rozuur commented May 12, 2018

Hi, @apbodnar Thanks for the pull request. I am trying to revive this project and would like to validate the use case with a test case. Is it possible for you to share the steps required for testing this feature?

@rozuur rozuur merged commit 86fb0f3 into bloomreach:master May 15, 2018
@nglange
Copy link

nglange commented May 15, 2018

Thanks!

VarunWachaspati pushed a commit to VarunWachaspati/s4cmd that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants