-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
refactor: abstract keyring logic to better enable DI #3262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5b772ac
feat: introduce a keyring abstraction to help with dep injection
cloud-on-prem 6cfe494
feat: use dep injection for keyring ops
cloud-on-prem 7172ff5
fix: lints and fmts
cloud-on-prem b3e8815
feat: more just recipes for qol
cloud-on-prem 164c067
refactor: reuse keyring abstraction from goose crate
cloud-on-prem 81a4523
chore: add a lint-all just directive
cloud-on-prem 8fc3a31
fix: fix nested runtime issues by using shared future rt
cloud-on-prem 07c8e73
refactor: move file based keyring logic to own module
cloud-on-prem 61d4225
refactor(tests): use a guard pattern to restore env vars
cloud-on-prem 076536f
fix: ensure old secrets.yaml format still works
cloud-on-prem 8a00bf4
fix: make the env assertion more robust for GOOSE_DISABLE_KEYRING
cloud-on-prem 84e2440
refactor: make secrets file a constant
cloud-on-prem 838bf76
wip
cloud-on-prem File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a reason that lint doesn't do all-targets too? I feel like having distinct lint commands means we won't use one of them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah - currently lint-all fails; we should fix them up in another PR. I left it there for future use. Currently
just lintis equivalent of what's run in CI