Remove wpscan module

[liquidsec]

Removes the wpscan module and its test. It's become too heavy and too brittle for bbot's lightweight install model:

• Heavy install footprint. wpscan is a Ruby gem that needs a build toolchain (gcc, make, ruby-dev) to compile a native C extension (yajl-ruby, pulled in transitively via cms_scanner) on the user's machine. Enabling one module drags a compiler onto the host.
• Brittle pinned dependencies. wpscan 3.8.28 pins an old activesupport (6.1.x). When the transitive concurrent-ruby released 1.3.5 (which dropped its implicit require 'logger'), wpscan stopped booting entirely with uninitialized constant ActiveSupport::LoggerThreadSafeLevel::Logger. That's a field breakage with zero changes on our side, and it recurs whenever a transitive gem floats forward.
• Stuck on the old pin. Current wpscan (4.x) requires Ruby >= 3.3, newer than what Ubuntu 24.04 and the CI runners ship (3.2.3), so we can't move off the brittle 3.8.x line.
• Failures weren't graceful. setup() returned True unconditionally without verifying wpscan could run, so when it failed it raised on every event ('NoneType' object has no attribute 'stdout', or json.loads("") on empty output), flooding scans with errors.
• The test never ran the tool. The module test monkeypatches helpers.run to return canned JSON, so it only exercised the output parser; the binary was never invoked. That's why CI stayed green while the tool was broken in the field.

Removes:

• bbot/modules/wpscan.py
• bbot/test/test_step_2/module_tests/test_module_wpscan.py

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Benchmark Report

Comparing dev (baseline) vs remove-wpscan-module (current)

📈 Detailed Results (All Benchmarks)

📋 Complete results for all benchmarks - includes both significant and insignificant changes

🧪 Test Name	📏 Base	📏 Current	📈 Change	🎯 Status
Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance	4.55ms	4.34ms	-4.7% ⚪	✅
Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force	18.67ms	18.02ms	-3.5% ⚪	✅
Large Closest Match Lookup	346.13ms	326.04ms	-5.8% ⚪	✅
Realistic Closest Match Workload	182.36ms	178.64ms	-2.0% ⚪	✅
Event Memory Medium Scan	1402 B/event	1402 B/event	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Event Memory Large Scan	1527 B/event	1527 B/event	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Small Batch	407.33ms	392.97ms	-3.5% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Large Batch	517.31ms	501.54ms	-3.0% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Small	20.35ms	20.19ms	-0.8% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Large	208.54ms	202.75ms	-2.8% ⚪	✅
Make Event Explicit Types	8.68ms	8.33ms	-4.0% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Small	3.648s	3.636s	-0.3% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Large	9.270s	9.322s	+0.6% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Small	3.823s	3.855s	+0.8% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Large	5.861s	5.844s	-0.3% ⚪	✅
Intercept Throughput Small	905.37ms	982.80ms	+8.6% ⚪	✅
Intercept Throughput Medium	892.49ms	881.45ms	-1.2% ⚪	✅
Dns Throughput Quiet	2.578s	2.634s	+2.2% ⚪	✅
Dns Throughput Loaded	1.772s	1.702s	-3.9% ⚪	✅
Dns Throughput Inherited	2.317s	2.148s	-7.3% ⚪	✅
Is Ip Performance	2.47ms	2.31ms	-6.4% ⚪	✅
Make Ip Type Performance	208.73µs	294.04µs	+40.9% 🔴🔴🔴	⚠️
Mixed Ip Operations	2.49ms	2.39ms	-3.8% ⚪	✅
Memory Use Web Crawl	1.0 MB	1.0 MB	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Memory Use Subdomain Enum	28.3 MB	28.3 MB	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Memory Use Deep Chain	5.0 MB	5.0 MB	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Memory Use Parallel Chains	10.7 MB	12.1 MB	+12.7% 🟡🟡	⚠️
Scan Throughput 100	2.728s	2.493s	-8.6% ⚪	✅
Scan Throughput 1000	17.976s	17.734s	-1.3% ⚪	✅
Typical Queue Shuffle	5.32µs	5.46µs	+2.7% ⚪	✅
Priority Queue Shuffle	26.50µs	26.82µs	+1.2% ⚪	✅

🎯 Performance Summary

! 2 regressions ⚠️
  29 unchanged ✅

🔍 Significant Changes (>10%)

• Make Ip Type Performance: 40.9% 🐌 slower
• Memory Use Parallel Chains: 12.7% 🐌 more memory

---

🐍 Python Version 3.11.15

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90%. Comparing base (3bc8e9c) to head (76fe1be).

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev   #3243    +/-   ##
======================================
+ Coverage     90%     90%    +1%     
======================================
  Files        453     451     -2     
  Lines      46304   46125   -179     
======================================
- Hits       41411   41270   -141     
+ Misses      4893    4855    -38     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.