Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-jest to ~24.7.0 #13

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Apr 25, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint-plugin-jest ~24.1.3 -> ~24.7.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest (eslint-plugin-jest)

v24.7.0

Compare Source

Features

v24.6.0

Compare Source

Features

24.5.2 (2021-10-04)

Bug Fixes
  • lowercase-name: consider skip and only prefixes for ignores (#​923) (8716c24)

24.5.1 (2021-10-04)

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-to-be: don't consider RegExp literals as toBe-able (#​922) (99b6d42)

v24.5.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • lowercase-name: consider skip and only prefixes for ignores (#​923) (8716c24)

v24.5.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • prefer-to-be: don't consider RegExp literals as toBe-able (#​922) (99b6d42)

v24.5.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-deprecated-functions: remove process.cwd from resolve paths (#​889) (6940488)
  • no-identical-title: always consider .each titles unique (#​910) (a41a40e)
Features

24.4.3 (2021-09-28)

Bug Fixes
  • valid-expect-in-promise: support finally (#​914) (9c89855)
  • valid-expect-in-promise: support additional test functions (#​915) (4798005)

24.4.2 (2021-09-17)

Bug Fixes
  • use correct property hasSuggestions rather than hasSuggestion (#​899) (dfd2368)

24.4.1 (2021-09-17)

Bug Fixes
  • mark rules that suggest fixes with hasSuggestion for ESLint v8 (#​898) (ec0a21b)

v24.4.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • valid-expect-in-promise: support finally (#​914) (9c89855)
  • valid-expect-in-promise: support additional test functions (#​915) (4798005)

v24.4.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • use correct property hasSuggestions rather than hasSuggestion (#​899) (dfd2368)

v24.4.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • mark rules that suggest fixes with hasSuggestion for ESLint v8 (#​898) (ec0a21b)

v24.4.0

Compare Source

Features

24.3.7 (2021-07-21)

Bug Fixes
  • valid-describe: report on concise-body arrow functions (#​863) (71c5299)

24.3.6 (2021-04-26)

Bug Fixes
  • no-conditional-expect: check for expects in catchs on promises (#​819) (1fee973)
  • valid-expect: support async expect in ternary statements (#​833) (7b7a396)
  • improve handling of .each calls and with tagged literals (#​814) (040c605)

24.3.5 (2021-04-10)

Bug Fixes
  • valid-describe: support using each with modifiers (#​820) (cbdbcef)

24.3.4 (2021-04-05)

Bug Fixes

24.3.3 (2021-04-02)

Bug Fixes

24.3.2 (2021-03-16)

Bug Fixes

24.3.1 (2021-03-13)

Bug Fixes
  • no-focused-tests: report on skip instead of concurrent (#​791) (2b65b49)

v24.3.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • valid-describe: report on concise-body arrow functions (#​863) (71c5299)

v24.3.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-conditional-expect: check for expects in catchs on promises (#​819) (1fee973)
  • valid-expect: support async expect in ternary statements (#​833) (7b7a396)
  • improve handling of .each calls and with tagged literals (#​814) (040c605)

v24.3.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • valid-describe: support using each with modifiers (#​820) (cbdbcef)

v24.3.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v24.3.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v24.3.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v24.3.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-focused-tests: report on skip instead of concurrent (#​791) (2b65b49)

v24.3.0

Compare Source

Features

24.2.1 (2021-03-10)

Bug Fixes

v24.2.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v24.2.0

Compare Source

Features

24.1.10 (2021-03-09)

Bug Fixes
  • no-identical-titles: ignore .each template cases (#​788) (d27a6e6)

24.1.9 (2021-03-08)

Bug Fixes
  • valid-describe: false positive with template describe.each (#​785) (aa946a6)

24.1.8 (2021-03-07)

Bug Fixes
  • consistent-test-it: support it.each in describe.each (#​782) (0014da0)

24.1.7 (2021-03-06)

Bug Fixes
  • no-disabled-tests: adjust selector to match only test functions (#​777) (c916902)
  • no-disabled-tests: support describe.skip.each & xdescribe.each (#​778) (6a32e87)

24.1.6 (2021-03-06)

Bug Fixes

24.1.5 (2021-02-17)

Bug Fixes
  • require-top-level-describe: import function that actually exists (#​763) (d10dc07)

24.1.4 (2021-02-16)

Bug Fixes

24.1.3 (2020-11-12)

Bug Fixes

24.1.2 (2020-11-12)

Bug Fixes

24.1.1 (2020-11-12)

Bug Fixes
  • improve support for it.each involving tagged template literals (#​701) (2341814)

v24.1.10

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-identical-titles: ignore .each template cases (#​788) (d27a6e6)

v24.1.9

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • valid-describe: false positive with template describe.each (#​785) (aa946a6)

v24.1.8

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • consistent-test-it: support it.each in describe.each (#​782) (0014da0)

v24.1.7

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • no-disabled-tests: adjust selector to match only test functions (#​777) (c916902)
  • no-disabled-tests: support describe.skip.each & xdescribe.each (#​778) (6a32e87)

v24.1.6

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v24.1.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • require-top-level-describe: import function that actually exists (#​763) (d10dc07)

v24.1.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants