You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
by embracing strong backward compatibility and switching back accept-deprecated-v1-data to true by default.
Rationale
While sealed-secrets is a tool in many people's tool boxes, it's a rather "invisible" tool.
It stays there, does it's job and people focus on other things, often for years before putting back the spotlight on sealed secrets (usually when installing a new cluster etc). A 1yo version may appear ancient for us maintainers, but we do have
people out there running those versions, and we should make it easier (not harder!) for people to upgrade.
Furthermore, sealed-secrets's support is best effort and backward compatibility is a good idea if it can reduce the amount of questions by confused users who just happen to have to install sealed secrets in a new clusters, after having used a >2y old version in a previous cluster with no problems.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mkmik
changed the title
Make upgrades from ancient controllers easy
Make it easier to upgrade from ancient (pre v0.7.0) controllers
Oct 28, 2020
mkmik
changed the title
Make it easier to upgrade from ancient (pre v0.7.0) controllers
Make it easier to upgrade from ancient (pre v0.9.0) controllers
Oct 28, 2020
by embracing strong backward compatibility and switching back
accept-deprecated-v1-data
totrue
by default.Rationale
While sealed-secrets is a tool in many people's tool boxes, it's a rather "invisible" tool.
It stays there, does it's job and people focus on other things, often for years before putting back the spotlight on sealed secrets (usually when installing a new cluster etc). A 1yo version may appear ancient for us maintainers, but we do have
people out there running those versions, and we should make it easier (not harder!) for people to upgrade.
Furthermore, sealed-secrets's support is best effort and backward compatibility is a good idea if it can reduce the amount of questions by confused users who just happen to have to install sealed secrets in a new clusters, after having used a >2y old version in a previous cluster with no problems.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: