feat: use new Weight type throughout the BDK codebase, instead of usize for weight units
#1466
Comments
8 tasks
3 tasks
notmandatory
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 13, 2024
…ipt` to `0.12.0` and others 1120081 chore(wallet): rm dup code (志宇) 2a45640 deps(bdk): bump `bitcoin` to `0.32.0`, miniscript to `12.0.0` (Leonardo Lima) Pull request description: fixes #1422 <!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. --> ### Description This PR focuses on upgrading the `rust-bitcoin` and `miniscript` versions, to `0.32.0` and `0.12.0`, respectively. It also bumps the versions of other BDK ecosystem crates that also rely on both `rust-bitcoin` and `miniscript`, being: - electrum-client bitcoindevkit/rust-electrum-client#133 - esplora-client bitcoindevkit/rust-esplora-client#85 - hwi bitcoindevkit/rust-hwi#99 <ins>I structured the PR in multiple commits, with closed scope, being one for each BDK crate being upgraded, and one for each kind of fix and upgrade required, it seems like a lot of commits (**that should be squashed before merging**), but I think it'll make it easier during review phase.</ins> In summary I can already mention some of the main changes: - using `compute_txid()` instead of deprecated `txid()` - using `minimal_non_dust()` instead of `dust_value()` - using the renamed `signature` and `sighash_type` fields - using proper `sighash::P2wpkhError`, `sighash::TaprootError` instead of older `sighash::Error` - conversion from `Network` to new expected `NetworkKind` #1465 - conversion from the new `Weight` type to current expected `usize` #1466 - using `.into()` to convert from AbsLockTime and `RelLockTime` to `absolute::LockTime` and `relative::LockTime` - using Message::from_digest() instead of relying on deprecated `ThirtyTwoByteHash` trait. - updating the miniscript policy and dsl to proper expect and handle new `Threshold` type, instead of the previous two parameters. <!-- Describe the purpose of this PR, what's being adding and/or fixed --> ### Notes to the reviewers <ins>Again, I structured the PR in multiple commits, with closed scope, being one for each BDK crate being upgraded, and one for each kind of fix and upgrade required, it seems like a lot of commits (**that should be squashed before merging**), but I think it'll make it easier during review phase.</ins> It should definitely be carefully reviewed, especially the last commits for the wallet crate scope, the ones with the semantic `fix(wallet)`. I would also appreciate if @tcharding reviewed it, as he gave a try in the past (#1400 ), and I relied on some of it for the policy part of it, other rust-bitcoin maintainers reviews are a definitely welcome 😁 <!-- In this section you can include notes directed to the reviewers, like explaining why some parts of the PR were done in a specific way --> ### Changelog notice > // TODO(@oleonardolima): Do another pass and double check the changes - Use `compute_txid()` instead of deprecated `txid()` - Use `minimal_non_dust()` instead of `dust_value()` - Use `signature` and `sighash_type` fields, instead of previous `sig` and `hash_type` - Use `sighash::P2wpkhError`, and `sighash::TaprootError` instead of older `sighash::Error` - Converts from `Network` to `NetworkKind`, where expected - Converts from `Weight` type to current used `usize` - Use `.into()` to convert from `AbsLockTime` and `RelLockTime` to `absolute::LockTime` and `relative::LockTime` - Remove use of deprecated `ThirtyTwoByteHash` trait, use `Message::from_digest()` - Update the miniscript policy and dsl macros to proper expect and handle new `Threshold` type, instead of the previous two parameters. <!-- Notice the release manager should include in the release tag message changelog --> <!-- See https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ for examples --> ### Checklists #### All Submissions: * [x] I've signed all my commits * [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) * [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing #### New Features: * [ ] I've added tests for the new feature * [ ] I've added docs for the new feature #### Bugfixes: * [ ] This pull request breaks the existing API * [ ] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing * [ ] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR ACKs for top commit: notmandatory: ACK 1120081 Tree-SHA512: ba1ab64603b41014d3f0866d846167f77d31959ca6f1d9c3181d5e543964f5d772e05651d63935ba7bbffeba41a66868d27de4c32129739b9ca50f3bbaf9f2a1
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the enhancement
In the new release of rust-bitcoin 0.32.0 the new Weight type has been introduced through
bitcoin-units0.1.1, it's not being explicitly used in the PR #1448, but it should be instead of using.to_wu() as usizeconversions.Use case
Use the proper
Weighttype/API, instead of the currentusize, for referring to weight units.Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: