test: Add test for conflicted wallet tx notifications #18878
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add test coverage for conflicted wallet transaction notifications so we improve current behavior and avoid future regressions bitcoin#9240 - accidental break bitcoin#9479 - bug report bitcoin#9371 - fix bitcoin#16624 - accidental break bitcoin#18325 - bug report bitcoin#18600 - potential fix
Contributor
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ConflictsReviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
jonatack
reviewed
May 12, 2020
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for reviews, updated 2c1c162 -> f963a68 ( |
Member
|
Good to have a test for this, it always used to be somewhat ill-defined functionality, apparently breaking many times (reading that list hurts!). ACK f963a68 |
Member
|
re-ACK f963a68 |
Member
|
ACK f963a68 |
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2020
…tions f963a68 test: Add test for conflicted wallet tx notifications (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: Add test coverage for conflicted wallet transaction notifications so we can improve current behavior and avoid future regressions bitcoin#9240 - accidental break bitcoin#9479 - bug report bitcoin#9371 - fix bitcoin#16624 - accidental break bitcoin#18325 - bug report bitcoin#18600 - potential fix ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK f963a68 jonatack: re-ACK f963a68 MarcoFalke: ACK f963a68 Tree-SHA512: d3a7952a2d3dc2ff0800ef857575ea4ef9759c0917d58a7fc91e2db0ca3cc3baf0dd0cf9af61683f691e5fefb11afe8120bb5810c7037ed9ecedee385dd4aa07
fanquake
pushed a commit
to fanquake/bitcoin
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2020
Add test coverage for conflicted wallet transaction notifications so we improve current behavior and avoid future regressions bitcoin#9240 - accidental break bitcoin#9479 - bug report bitcoin#9371 - fix bitcoin#16624 - accidental break bitcoin#18325 - bug report bitcoin#18600 - potential fix Github-Pull: bitcoin#18878 Rebased-From: f963a68
fanquake
pushed a commit
to fanquake/bitcoin
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2020
Add test coverage for conflicted wallet transaction notifications so we improve current behavior and avoid future regressions bitcoin#9240 - accidental break bitcoin#9479 - bug report bitcoin#9371 - fix bitcoin#16624 - accidental break bitcoin#18325 - bug report bitcoin#18600 - potential fix Github-Pull: bitcoin#18878 Rebased-From: f963a68
maflcko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2020
245c862 test: disable script fuzz tests (fanquake) 9a8fb4c fuzz: Remove enumeration of expected deserialization exceptions in ProcessMessage(...) fuzzer (practicalswift) 6161c94 [net processing] Only send a getheaders for one block in an INV (John Newbery) cf2a6e2 test: Remove const to work around compiler error on xenial (Wladimir J. van der Laan) cc7d344 miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface (MarcoFalke) 37a6207 test: Add unregister_validation_interface_race test (MarcoFalke) ff4dc20 gui: Fix manual coin control with multiple wallets loaded (João Barbosa) ed0afe8 test: Add test for conflicted wallet tx notifications (Russell Yanofsky) 251e321 rpc: Relock wallet only if most recent callback (João Barbosa) ca4dac4 rpc: Add mutex to guard deadlineTimers (João Barbosa) a3fe458 [docs] Improve commenting in ProcessGetData() (John Newbery) 011532e [test] test that an invalid GETDATA doesn't prevent processing of future messages (Amiti Uttarwar) 1e73d72 [net processing] ignore unknown INV types in GETDATA messages (Amiti Uttarwar) fb82173 [net processing] ignore tx GETDATA from blocks-only peers (Amiti Uttarwar) 315ae14 gui: Fix itemWalletAddress leak when not tree mode (João Barbosa) Pull request description: Backports the following PRs to the 0.20 branch: * #18578: gui: Fix leak in CoinControlDialog::updateView * #18808: [net processing] Drop unknown types in getdata * #18814: rpc: Relock wallet only if most recent callback * #18878: test: Add test for conflicted wallet tx notifications * #18894: gui: Fix manual coin control with multiple wallets loaded * #18742: miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface * #18962: net processing: Only send a getheaders for one block in an INV * #18975: test: Remove const to work around compiler error on xenial ACKs for top commit: promag: Tested ACK 245c862 coin control with multiple wallets. laanwj: ACK 245c862 MarcoFalke: ACK 245c862 solved the conflicts myself as a sanity check. Did not re-review 🍷 Tree-SHA512: 285e5a5fad5bbeba6032742c65dc68836e8eccfcceda9e69fec4ddd162a3f61679a96f9bbe3d434267835af67c21ac4c05accf6f63e827c2eb47203c6daafe31
backpacker69
referenced
this pull request
in peercoin/peercoin
Mar 28, 2021
Add test coverage for conflicted wallet transaction notifications so we improve current behavior and avoid future regressions bitcoin/bitcoin#9240 - accidental break bitcoin/bitcoin#9479 - bug report bitcoin/bitcoin#9371 - fix bitcoin/bitcoin#16624 - accidental break bitcoin/bitcoin#18325 - bug report bitcoin/bitcoin#18600 - potential fix Github-Pull: #18878 Rebased-From: f963a68
Fabcien
pushed a commit
to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2021
Summary: Add a couple of test for wallet notifications. Backport notes: - The original PR dealt with conflicting transactions due to RBF trickery, which is not possible on the eCash blockchain. So the test is different, we simply create conflicting transactions while the nodes are disconnected. - In the original PR, the test for conflicting transactions does not work correctly. We do not observe the same bug. There is a notification for the conflicting transaction, as expected. This is a backport of [[bitcoin/bitcoin#18878 | core#18878]] Test Plan: `ninja check-functional` Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D9972
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add test coverage for conflicted wallet transaction notifications so we can improve current behavior and avoid future regressions
#9240 - accidental break
#9479 - bug report
#9371 - fix
#16624 - accidental break
#18325 - bug report
#18600 - potential fix