Skip to content

Add two ECDSA edge case tests#126

Merged
sipa merged 2 commits intobitcoin-core:masterfrom
sipa:moartests
Dec 1, 2014
Merged

Add two ECDSA edge case tests#126
sipa merged 2 commits intobitcoin-core:masterfrom
sipa:moartests

Conversation

@sipa
Copy link
Contributor

@sipa sipa commented Dec 1, 2014

The first triggers when the overflow check in ECDSA signature parsing is disabled.

The second one exercises the 'else' branch for the recomputed point not being infinity.

Both are suggested by @gmaxwell.

sipa referenced this pull request in sipa/secp256k1 Dec 1, 2014
@sipa sipa changed the title Add two ECDSA test cases Add two ECDSA edge case tests Dec 1, 2014
@gmaxwell
Copy link
Contributor

gmaxwell commented Dec 1, 2014

ACK.

@sipa sipa merged commit 24b3c65 into bitcoin-core:master Dec 1, 2014
sipa added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2014
24b3c65 Add a test case for ECDSA recomputing infinity (Pieter Wuille)
32600e5 Add a test for r >= order signature handling (Pieter Wuille)
real-or-random added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2026
8354618 cmake: Set `LABELS` property for tests (Hennadii Stepanov)
29f26ec cmake: Integrate DiscoverTests and normalize test names (Hennadii Stepanov)
f95b263 cmake: Add DiscoverTests module (Hennadii Stepanov)
4ac6511 cmake, refactor: Deduplicate test-related code (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR implements the idea suggested in #1734 (review) and is based on the work from bitcoin/bitcoin#33483.

  Here is an example of the `ctest` output:
  ```
  $ ctest --test-dir build -j $(nproc)
  Test project /home/hebasto/dev/secp256k1/secp256k1/build
          Start   1: secp256k1.noverify_tests.selftest_tests
          Start   2: secp256k1.noverify_tests.all_proper_context_tests
          Start   3: secp256k1.noverify_tests.all_static_context_tests
          Start   4: secp256k1.noverify_tests.deprecated_context_flags_test
  <snip>
  193/196 Test  #31: secp256k1.noverify_tests.ecmult_constants .........................   Passed    5.32 sec
  194/196 Test #184: secp256k1.tests.ellswift_xdh_correctness_tests ....................   Passed    5.62 sec
  195/196 Test #191: secp256k1.exhaustive_tests ........................................   Passed    6.97 sec
  196/196 Test #126: secp256k1.tests.ecmult_constants ..................................   Passed    9.60 sec

  100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 196

  Label Time Summary:
  secp256k1_example           =   0.02 sec*proc (5 tests)
  secp256k1_exhaustive        =   6.97 sec*proc (1 test)
  secp256k1_noverify_tests    =  23.77 sec*proc (95 tests)
  secp256k1_tests             =  43.67 sec*proc (95 tests)

  Total Test time (real) =  10.21 sec
  ```

  For comparison, here is the output for the master branch on the same machine:
  ```
  $ ctest --test-dir build -j $(nproc)
  Test project /home/hebasto/dev/secp256k1/secp256k1/build
      Start 1: secp256k1_noverify_tests
      Start 2: secp256k1_tests
      Start 3: secp256k1_exhaustive_tests
      Start 4: secp256k1_ecdsa_example
      Start 5: secp256k1_ecdh_example
      Start 6: secp256k1_schnorr_example
      Start 7: secp256k1_ellswift_example
      Start 8: secp256k1_musig_example
  1/8 Test #4: secp256k1_ecdsa_example ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  2/8 Test #5: secp256k1_ecdh_example ...........   Passed    0.00 sec
  3/8 Test #6: secp256k1_schnorr_example ........   Passed    0.00 sec
  4/8 Test #7: secp256k1_ellswift_example .......   Passed    0.00 sec
  5/8 Test #8: secp256k1_musig_example ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  6/8 Test #3: secp256k1_exhaustive_tests .......   Passed    6.26 sec
  7/8 Test #1: secp256k1_noverify_tests .........   Passed   14.31 sec
  8/8 Test #2: secp256k1_tests ..................   Passed   31.65 sec

  100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 8

  Total Test time (real) =  31.65 sec
  ```

  ---

  **New Feature:** As the number of tests has grown, the _labels_ have been introduced to simplify test management. Now, one can run:
  ```
  $ ctest --test-dir build -j $(nproc) -L example
  Test project /home/hebasto/dev/secp256k1/secp256k1/build
      Start 192: secp256k1.example.ecdsa
      Start 193: secp256k1.example.ecdh
      Start 194: secp256k1.example.schnorr
      Start 195: secp256k1.example.ellswift
      Start 196: secp256k1.example.musig
  1/5 Test #192: secp256k1.example.ecdsa ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  2/5 Test #193: secp256k1.example.ecdh ...........   Passed    0.00 sec
  3/5 Test #194: secp256k1.example.schnorr ........   Passed    0.00 sec
  4/5 Test #195: secp256k1.example.ellswift .......   Passed    0.00 sec
  5/5 Test #196: secp256k1.example.musig ..........   Passed    0.00 sec

  100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 5

  Label Time Summary:
  secp256k1_example    =   0.01 sec*proc (5 tests)

  Total Test time (real) =   0.01 sec
  ```
  or
  ```
  $ ctest --test-dir build -j $(nproc) -LE tests
  Test project /home/hebasto/dev/secp256k1/secp256k1/build
      Start 192: secp256k1.example.ecdsa
      Start 193: secp256k1.example.ecdh
      Start 194: secp256k1.example.schnorr
      Start 195: secp256k1.example.ellswift
      Start 196: secp256k1.example.musig
      Start 191: secp256k1.exhaustive_tests
  1/6 Test #192: secp256k1.example.ecdsa ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  2/6 Test #193: secp256k1.example.ecdh ...........   Passed    0.00 sec
  3/6 Test #194: secp256k1.example.schnorr ........   Passed    0.00 sec
  4/6 Test #195: secp256k1.example.ellswift .......   Passed    0.00 sec
  5/6 Test #196: secp256k1.example.musig ..........   Passed    0.00 sec
  6/6 Test #191: secp256k1.exhaustive_tests .......   Passed    6.19 sec

  100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 6

  Label Time Summary:
  secp256k1_example       =   0.01 sec*proc (5 tests)
  secp256k1_exhaustive    =   6.19 sec*proc (1 test)

  Total Test time (real) =   6.20 sec
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  purpleKarrot:
    ACK 8354618
  furszy:
    Tested ACK 8354618

Tree-SHA512: 8c506ab08491aba4836b3058a8a09c929c6dd097c11e4e6f4deb20cf602285e73c3fd8a2c2040f7e92a058c7f8fc09752fa9de2ce80f7673adbdd505237ed262
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants