You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The seed.subsystem synonym should be removed and used to create it's own entry as a prefix. This follows the convention of having sub-prefixes that are indicative of the data type. For example there are a seed.compound and seed.reaction entries, and I will be shortly proposing a new seed.role entry.
Contributor ORCID
0000-0002-7674-5194
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
samseaver
added
the
Update
Used in combination with prefix, metaprefix, or collection for updates to entries
label
Jan 6, 2025
That's a good point, we could swap seed.subsystem to be the primary prefix for consistency. It's not clear how this relates to other potential SEED prefixes, so lets wait for discussion on #1340 and others before making the swap
Prefix
seed
Explanation
The
seed.subsystem
synonym should be removed and used to create it's own entry as a prefix. This follows the convention of having sub-prefixes that are indicative of the data type. For example there are aseed.compound
andseed.reaction
entries, and I will be shortly proposing a newseed.role
entry.Contributor ORCID
0000-0002-7674-5194
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: