Remove unnecessary example

[lanker]

The two examples given only differed on how the div element was closed (self-closing vs non-self-closing), which is not relevant to the rule at hand. To avoid confusing the reader, let's keep only one of the examples.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for biomejs ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	ba6f63e
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/biomejs/deploys/666946fb938f300008a86b02
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-591--biomejs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[Sec-ant]

Hi @lanker

• The page is generated from the source code. So to remove the example, you'll have to edit the document comments in the source.
• I think both of the two examples exist because we want to make sure the rule works on both the openning tag and the self-closing element (We run our analyzer on the code blocks in this page when building it). But I agree this may confuse the reader and I also noticed we already have dedicated test cases for this purpose. So I think removing one of them is ok.
• Given that the rule useSelfClosingElements exists, what do you think of removing the other example, simply for consistency?

[lanker]

Hi @lanker

Hi, thanks for the quick feedback!

* The page is generated from the source code. So to remove the example, you'll have to edit the [document comments in the source](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/0d9b60a181cf59004815c928c277d13f60fb3b9b/crates/biome_js_analyze/src/lint/a11y/use_key_with_click_events.rs#L16-L19).

Ah! Sorry for not looking more carefully how it's done.

* I think both of the two examples exist because we want to make sure the rule works on both the openning tag and the self-closing element (We run our analyzer on the code blocks in this page when building it). But I agree this may confuse the reader and I also noticed we already have [dedicated test cases](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/0d9b60a181cf59004815c928c277d13f60fb3b9b/crates/biome_js_analyze/tests/specs/a11y/useKeyWithClickEvents/invalid.jsx#L3-L4) for this purpose. So I think removing one of them is ok.

* Given that the rule [useSelfClosingElements](https://biomejs.dev/linter/rules/use-self-closing-elements/) exists, what do you think of removing the other example, simply for consistency?

Yep, makes sense to keep the self-closing example instead. I opened a new PR towards the biome repo: biomejs/biome#3185 and will close this one.