refactor(deserialize): allow setting name for root deserialized value

[Conaclos]

Summary

Allow naming the root deserialized value.
This addresses some requests of #1250.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for biomejs canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	2257da3
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/biomejs/deploys/659bf9d8346365000872a721

[github-actions]

Parser conformance results on

js/262

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	49701	49701	0
Passed	48721	48721	0
Failed	980	980	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	98.03%	98.03%	0.00%

jsx/babel

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	40	40	0
Passed	37	37	0
Failed	3	3	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	92.50%	92.50%	0.00%

symbols/microsoft

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	6322	6322	0
Passed	2036	2036	0
Failed	4286	4286	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	32.20%	32.20%	0.00%

ts/babel

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	662	662	0
Passed	592	592	0
Failed	70	70	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	89.43%	89.43%	0.00%

ts/microsoft

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	17646	17646	0
Passed	13452	13452	0
Failed	4192	4192	0
Panics	2	2	0
Coverage	76.23%	76.23%	0.00%

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1463 will degrade performances by 15.87%

_{Comparing conaclos/deserialize/named-root (aaad110) with main (cc3a756)}

Summary

❌ 1 regressions
✅ 92 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	conaclos/deserialize/named-root	Change
❌	eucjp.json[uncached]	5.1 ms	6.1 ms	-15.87%

[ematipico]

Can we add a test where we use this new field?

[Conaclos]

Can we add a test where we use this new field?

You mean in the doctest?

[ematipico]

Lovely, thank you!