support for broker layer asynchronous transports (#677)

[iwannay]

Support for asynchronous transfer like Nginx, which can be transmitted to the opposite side after the broker layer fully receives the data

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #680 (b844255) into develop (e76d8a3) will increase coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 62.93%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #680      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    52.21%   52.36%   +0.14%     
===========================================
  Files          288      289       +1     
  Lines        22355    22587     +232     
===========================================
+ Hits         11673    11828     +155     
- Misses        9084     9147      +63     
- Partials      1598     1612      +14     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
bfe_server/proxy_state.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
bfe_server/reverseproxy.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
bfe_util/multibuf/buffer.go	78.04% <78.04%> (ø)
...bfe_cluster_conf/cluster_conf/cluster_conf_load.go	56.42% <100.00%> (+3.92%)	⬆️
bfe_spdy/frame_write.go	46.32% <0.00%> (+1.12%)	⬆️
bfe_spdy/server_write_sched.go	77.47% <0.00%> (+1.80%)	⬆️
bfe_websocket/server_conn.go	74.59% <0.00%> (+4.09%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e76d8a3...b844255. Read the comment docs.

[iwannay]

#677

[iwannay]

my package is organized a little bit differently than the BFE, in the BFE different types of packages are enclosed in parentheses but mine are not, and that might be a problem 😂