0.13: Add Dynamic Queries section #895
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nicopap
commented
Jan 30, 2024
|
The query transmutes that were added in that pr are immediately useful. Probably should be a separate section. |
ManevilleF
reviewed
Jan 31, 2024
|
@hymm I like the idea of writing a section in query transmutes. I could have used them in the past. |
Co-authored-by: Félix Lescaudey de Maneville <[email protected]>
I'll try and write something up for that. |
TrialDragon
reviewed
Feb 4, 2024
| * Create an [editor with remote capabilities]. | ||
| * And those are only what people came up with _before_ the 0.13 release! | ||
|
|
||
| We expect third party crates to provide convenient wrappers around the `QueryBuilder` API. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This sentence could be probably be better integrated into the start of the paragraph above.
Co-authored-by: TrialDragon <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For #891 announcement post.
I also added a subsection on relations, since it's a primary motivator for dynamic queries.
But, it feels like it's just too much for this section. Maybe push it to the "what's next?" section… Could use it as a synthesis for all the changes that brings us closer to relations.
@james-j-obrien, @jakobhellermann, @Suficio, or anyone. Please tell if anything is wrong or misleading.
I think I got it alright: context + motivation in two sentences, despite the subject being complex and not immediately useful to end users. Then spin it in a way that is interesting (I think) thanks to the amazing projects people are already building on top of dynamic queries, since those projects are useful for end users.