Write migration guide for 2024 edition panicking closure inference regression #2092
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
NthTensor
reviewed
Apr 9, 2025
NthTensor
approved these changes
Apr 9, 2025
JaySpruce
approved these changes
Apr 9, 2025
Co-authored-by: JaySpruce <[email protected]>
alice-i-cecile
added
S-Ready-For-Final-Review
Merged
4 tasks
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to bevyengine/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2025
…raits (#18804) # Objective After #17967, closures which always panic no longer satisfy various Bevy traits. Principally, this affects observers, systems and commands. While this may seem pointless (systems which always panic are kind of useless), it is distinctly annoying when using the `todo!` macro, or when writing tests that should panic. Fixes #18778. ## Solution - Add failing tests to demonstrate the problem - Add the trick from [`never_say_never`](https://docs.rs/never-say-never/latest/never_say_never/) to name the `!` type on stable Rust - Write looots of docs explaining what the heck is going on and why we've done this terrible thing ## To do Unfortunately I couldn't figure out how to avoid conflicting impls, and I am out of time for today, the week and uh the week after that. Vacation! If you feel like finishing this for me, please submit PRs to my branch and I can review and press the button for it while I'm off. Unless you're Cart, in which case you have write permissions to my branch! - [ ] fix for commands - [ ] fix for systems - [ ] fix for observers - [ ] revert bevyengine/bevy-website#2092 ## Testing I've added a compile test for these failure cases and a few adjacent non-failing cases (with explicit return types). --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <[email protected]>
mockersf
pushed a commit
to bevyengine/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2025
…raits (#18804) # Objective After #17967, closures which always panic no longer satisfy various Bevy traits. Principally, this affects observers, systems and commands. While this may seem pointless (systems which always panic are kind of useless), it is distinctly annoying when using the `todo!` macro, or when writing tests that should panic. Fixes #18778. ## Solution - Add failing tests to demonstrate the problem - Add the trick from [`never_say_never`](https://docs.rs/never-say-never/latest/never_say_never/) to name the `!` type on stable Rust - Write looots of docs explaining what the heck is going on and why we've done this terrible thing ## To do Unfortunately I couldn't figure out how to avoid conflicting impls, and I am out of time for today, the week and uh the week after that. Vacation! If you feel like finishing this for me, please submit PRs to my branch and I can review and press the button for it while I'm off. Unless you're Cart, in which case you have write permissions to my branch! - [ ] fix for commands - [ ] fix for systems - [ ] fix for observers - [ ] revert bevyengine/bevy-website#2092 ## Testing I've added a compile test for these failure cases and a few adjacent non-failing cases (with explicit return types). --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <[email protected]>
jf908
pushed a commit
to jf908/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2025
…raits (bevyengine#18804) # Objective After bevyengine#17967, closures which always panic no longer satisfy various Bevy traits. Principally, this affects observers, systems and commands. While this may seem pointless (systems which always panic are kind of useless), it is distinctly annoying when using the `todo!` macro, or when writing tests that should panic. Fixes bevyengine#18778. ## Solution - Add failing tests to demonstrate the problem - Add the trick from [`never_say_never`](https://docs.rs/never-say-never/latest/never_say_never/) to name the `!` type on stable Rust - Write looots of docs explaining what the heck is going on and why we've done this terrible thing ## To do Unfortunately I couldn't figure out how to avoid conflicting impls, and I am out of time for today, the week and uh the week after that. Vacation! If you feel like finishing this for me, please submit PRs to my branch and I can review and press the button for it while I'm off. Unless you're Cart, in which case you have write permissions to my branch! - [ ] fix for commands - [ ] fix for systems - [ ] fix for observers - [ ] revert bevyengine/bevy-website#2092 ## Testing I've added a compile test for these failure cases and a few adjacent non-failing cases (with explicit return types). --------- Co-authored-by: Carter Anderson <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Covers the issue reported in bevyengine/bevy#18778.